Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 13, ISSUE 4, P559-562, July 1988

Staged flexor tendon reconstruction in the fingers and hand

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      A two-stage tendon-grafting technique was used to reconstruct 130 fingers in 101 patients between 1973 and 1984. Eighty-nine patients with 117 fingers that had undergone operation were evaluated 6 months or longer after stage II surgery. Sixty-five percent of the patients were in the Boyes salvage group before operation. Overall, 54% had good or excellent results by the total active motion (TAM) as a percentage of total passive motion (TPM) method, although only 19% had final TAM of greater than 180 degrees. Complications included infection in 15%, rupture in 4%, amputation in 4%, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy in 1% of the patients. Sixteen percent of the patients required tenolysis after stage II surgery. Factors associated with a poor result included zone I or II injury and patients who were less than 10 years of age. Factors associated with a better result included zone IV or V injury and all postoperative therapy under the direct supervision of the treating surgeon.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wehbé MA
        • Hunter JM
        • Schneider LH
        • Goodwyn BL
        Two-stage flexor-tendon reconstruction: ten-year experience.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68A: 752-763
        • LaSalle WB
        • Strickland JW
        An evaluation of the two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction technique.
        J Hand Surg. 1983; 8: 263-267
        • Honner R
        • Meares A
        A review of 100 flexor tendon reconstructions with prosthesis.
        Hand. 1977; 9: 226-231
        • Hunter JM
        Staged flexor tendon reconstruction.
        J Hand Surg. 1983; 8: 789-793
        • Schneider LH
        Staged flexor tendon reconstruction using the method of Hunter.
        Clin Orthop. 1982; 171: 164-171
        • Hunter JM
        • Salisbury RE
        Flexor-tendon reconstruction is severely damaged hands: a two-stage procedure using a silicone-Dacron reinforced gliding prosthesis prior to tendon grafting.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1971; 53A: 829-858
        • Wilson RL
        • Carter MS
        • Holdeman VA
        • Lovett WL
        Flexor profundus injuries treated with delayed two-staged tendon grafting.
        J Hand Surg. 1980; 5: 74-78
        • Sullivan DJ
        Disappointing outcomes in staged flexor tendon grafting for isolated profundus loss.
        J Hand Surg. 1986; 11B: 231-233
        • Weinstein SL
        • Sprague BL
        • Flatt AE
        Evaluation of the two-stage flexor-tendon reconstruction in severely damaged digits.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1976; 58A: 786-791
        • Morrison WA
        Vascularized tendon grafting.
        in: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand, Tokyo, November 3–81986: 150
        • Paneva-Holevich E
        Two-stage tenoplasty in injury of the flexor tendons of the hand.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1969; 51A: 21-32
        • Kleinen HE
        • Verdan C
        Report of the committee on tendon injuries.
        J Hand Surg. 1983; 8: 794-798
        • Boyes JH
        Flexor-tendon grafts in the fingers and thumb: an evaluation of end results.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1950; 32A: 489-499
        • Boyes JH
        • Stark HH
        Flexor-tendon grafts in the fingers and thumb: a study of factors influencing results in 1000 cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1971; 53A: 1332-1342
        • Duran RJ
        • Houser RG
        • Stover MG
        Management of flexor tendon lacerations in Zone 2 using controlled passive motion postoperatively.
        in: Hunter JM Schneider LH Mackin E Bell J Rehabilitation of the hand. CV Mosby, St. Louis1978: 219-224
        • Lister GD
        • Kleinert HE
        • Kutz JE
        • Atasoy E
        Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization.
        J Hand Surg. 1977; 2: 441-451
        • Strickland JW
        • Glogovac SV
        Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques.
        J Hand Surg. 1980; 5: 537-543
        • Hunter JM
        • Jaeger SH
        Tendon implants: primary and secondary usage.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1977; 8: 473-489
        • Weeks PM
        • Wray RC
        Rate and extent of functional recovery after flexor tendon grafting with and without silicone rod preparation.
        J Hand Surg. 1976; 1: 174-180