Editorial| Volume 11, ISSUE 5, P621-623, September 1986

Download started.


The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Currier DP
        Elements of research in physical therapy. ed 2. The Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore1984: 145-174
        • Payton OD
        Research: The validation of clinical practice. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia1984: 111-123
        • Fess EE
        Hunter J Schneider L Mackin J Callahan A Rehabilitation of the hand. ed 2. The CV Mosby Co, St. Louis1984: 49-78
        • Jebson R
        • Taylor N
        • Triegchmann R
        • et al.
        An objective and standardized test of hand function.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969; 50: 311
      1. Minnesota rate of manipulation test. Layfayette Instrument Co, Sagamore and North Ninth Street, Layfayette, Ind.

        • Tiffin J
        • Asher E
        The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity.
        J Appl Psychol. 1948; 32: 234
      2. Crawford small parts dexterity test. The Psychological Corporation, 304 E. 45th St., New York, NY

        • Stanley J
        Thorndike RL Educational measurement. ed 2. American Council on Education, Washington DC1971: 356-442
        • Downie NM
        Fundamentals of measurement: Techniques and practices. ed 2. Oxford University Press, New York1967: 83-107
        • Cronbach LJ
        Thorndike RL Educational measurement. ed 2. American Council on Education, Washington DC1971: 443-501
        • Swinscow TDV
        Statistics at square one. British Medical Association, London1983
        • Brand PW
        Clinical mechanics of the hand. The CV Mosby Co, St. Louis1985: 170-174
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Rennells MS
        • Donahoe L
        Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength.
        J Hand Surg. 1985; 10A: 694-696
        • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
        Joint motion-Method of measuring and recording. The Academy, Chicago1956
        • American Society for Surgery of the Hand
        The handExamination and diagnosis. ed 2. Churchill Livingstone, New York1983
        • American Society of Hand Therapists
        Clinical assessment recommendations. The Society, Raleigh1981
        • Kirkpatrick JE
        Evaluation of grip loss: Factor of permanent disability in California: Summation and conclusions of sub-committee for study of grasping power committee on industrial health and rehabilitation of California medical association.
        Calif Med. 1956; 85: 314-320
        • Bechtol CD
        Grip test: Use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacing.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1954; 36: 820-824
        • Kendal H
        • Kendal F
        • Wadsworth G
        Muscle testing and function. The Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore1971
        • Cotton DJ
        • Bonnell L
        Investigation of the T-5 cable tensiometer grip attachment for measuring strength of college women.
        Research Quarterly. 1969; 40: 848-849
        • Bowers LE
        Investigation of the relationship of the hand size and lower arm girths to hand grip strength as measured by selected dynamometers.
        Research Quarterly. 1961; 32: 308-314
        • Heyward V
        • McKeown R
        • Lesseman
        Comparison of Stoelting hand grip dynamometer and linear voltage differential transformer for measuring grip strength.
        Research Quarterly. 1975; 46: 262-266
        • Nemethi CE
        Evaluation of hand grip in industry.
        Indust Med Surg. 1952; 21: 65
        • Thorngren KC
        • Werner CO
        Normal grip strength.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1979; 50: 255-259
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Weber K
        • Volland G
        • et al.
        Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.
        J Hand Surg. 1984; 9A: 222-226
        • Kellor M
        • Frost J
        • Silberg N
        • et al.
        Hand strength and dexterity.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1971; 25: 77-83
        • Schmidt R
        • Toews J
        Grip strength as measured by the Jaymar dynamometer.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970; 51: 321-327
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Kashman N
        • Volland G
        • et al.
        Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985; 66: 69-74
        • Curtis R
        • Engalitcheff J
        A work simulator for rehabilitating the upper extremity: Preliminary report.
        J Hand Surg. 1981; 6: 499-501
        • Wolf L
        • Klein L
        • Cauldwell-Klein E
        Comparison of torque strength measurements on two evaluation devices, Presented at the ninth annual meeting of the American Society of Hand Therapists, New Orleans1986
        • Berlin S
        • Vermette J
        An exploratory study of work simulator norms for grip and wrist flexion.
        Voc Eval & Work Adjst Bullet. 1985; : 61-65
        • Dellon A
        The moving two-point discrimination test: clinical evaluation of the quickly-adapting fiber receptor system.
        J Hand Surg. 1978; 3: 474-481
        • Dellon A
        • Curtis R
        • Edgerton M
        Reeducation of sensation in the hand after nerve injury and repair.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 53: 297-305
        • Gelberman RH
        • Szabo RV
        • Williamson R
        • et al.
        Sensibility testing in peripheral nerve compression syndrome: An experimental study in humans.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1983; 65: 632-638
        • Moberg E
        Objective methods of determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1958; 40: 454-456
        • Onne L
        Recovery of sensibility and sudomotor activity in the hand after severe injury.
        Acta Chir Scand. 1962; : 300
        • O'Rain S
        New and simple test for nerve function in the hand.
        Br Med J. 1973; 3: 615-616
        • Phelps P
        • Walker E
        Comparison the finger wrinkling test results to established sensory tests in peripheral nerve injury.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1977; 31: 565-572
        • Poppen N
        • McCarroll H
        • Doyle J
        • et al.
        Recovery of sensibility after suture of digital nerves.
        J Hand Surg. 1979; 4: 212-226
        • Porter RW
        New test for fingertip sensation.
        Br Med J. 1966; 2: 927-928
        • Seddon HJ
        Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. The Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore1972: 53
        • Semmes J
        • Weinstein S
        • et al.
        Somato-sensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man. Harvard University Press, Cambridge1960: 4-11
        • Szabo RM
        • Gelberman RH
        • et al.
        Vibratory sensory testing in acute peripheral nerve compression.
        J Hand Surg. 1984; 9A: 104-109
        • Weber E
        Verber den tastinn.
        Arch Anat Physiol. Wissensch Med. 1835; : 152-160
        • Bell J
        • Buford W
        The force/time relationship of clinically used sensory testing instruments, Presented at the thirty-seventh annual meeting of the American Society of Surgery of the Hand, New Orleans1982
        • Levin S
        • Pearsall C
        • Ruderman R
        Von Frey's method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer.
        J Hand Surg. 1978; 3: 211-216
        • Bell-Krotoski J
        • Tomancik L
        Repeatability of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, Presented at the ninth annual meeting of the American Society of Hand Therapists, New Orleans1986