Advertisement
Editor's Choice|Articles in Press

Predictors of Mortality and Revision Following Digital Amputation for Infection and Necrosis

Published:March 15, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.01.014

      Purpose

      Digital amputation is a commonly performed procedure for infection and necrosis in patients with diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and on dialysis. There is a lack of data regarding prognosis for revision amputation and mortality following digital amputation in these patients.

      Methods

      All digital amputations over 10-year period (2008–2018) at a single center were reviewed. There were 484 amputations in 360 patients, among which 358 were performed for trauma (reference sample) and 126 for infection or necrosis (sample of interest). Patient death and revision were determined from National Vital Statistics System and medical records. Propensity score matching was performed to compare groups. Data were then compared to the Social Security Administration Actuarial Life Table for 2015 to determine age-matched expected mortality.

      Results

      The 2-year revision rate was 34% for amputations performed for infection or necrosis, compared to 15% for amputations due to trauma. For amputations performed for infection or necrosis, the revision rate was 47.7% when diabetes, PVD, and dialysis were present. Among all patients with infection or necrosis (n = 104) undergoing a digital amputation, overall survival at 2, 5, and 10 years was 79.4%, 57.3%, and 17.5%, respectively, which represented a 3.2-fold increased risk of death compared to controls. (hazard ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.47–6.93). For amputations due to trauma, mortality was no different from that in the age-matched general population.

      Conclusions

      Mortality and revision risk are high for patients requiring a digital amputation for infection or necrosis and are further increased with medical comorbidities. Hand surgeons should consider the prognostic implications of these data when counseling patients.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Prognostic IV.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Harris A.P.
        • Goodman A.D.
        • Gil J.A.
        • Sobel A.D.
        • Li N.Y.
        • Raducha J.E.
        • et al.
        Incidence, timing, and risk factors for secondary revision after primary revision of traumatic digit amputations.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 43 (1040.e1-1040.e11)
        • Stolic R.
        Most important chronic complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.
        Med Princ Pract. 2013; 22: 220-228
        • Stone A.V.
        • Xu N.M.
        • Patterson R.W.
        • Koman L.A.
        • Smith B.P.
        • Li Z.
        Five-year mortality for patients with end-stage renal disease who undergo upper extremity amputation.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40: 666-672
        • Landry G.J.
        • McClary A.
        • Liem T.K.
        • Mitchell E.L.
        • Azarbal A.F.
        • Moneta G.L.
        Factors affecting healing and survival after finger amputations in patients with digital artery occlusive disease.
        Am J Surg. 2013; 205: 566-570
        • Kadukammakal J.
        • Yau S.
        • Urbas W.
        Assessment of partial first-ray resections and their tendency to progress to transmetatarsal amputations: a retrospective study.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012; 102: 412-416
        • Borkosky S.L.
        • Roukis T.S.
        Incidence of re-amputation following partial first ray amputation associated with diabetes mellitus and peripheral sensory neuropathy: a systematic review.
        Diabet Foot Ankle. 2012; 312169
        • Thorud J.C.
        • Jupiter D.C.
        • Lorenzana J.
        • Nguyen T.T.
        • Shibuya N.
        Reoperation and reamputation after transmetatarsal amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 1007-1012
        • Yeager R.A.
        • Moneta G.L.
        • Edwards J.M.
        • Landry G.J.
        • Taylor Jr., L.M.
        • McConnell D.B.
        • et al.
        Relationship of hemodialysis access to finger gangrene in patients with end-stage renal disease.
        J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 245-249
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        2nd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988
        • Finkelstein D.M.
        • Muzikansky A.
        • Schoenfeld D.A.
        Comparing survival of a sample to that of a standard population.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 1434-1439
        • Social Security
        Actuarial Life Table.
        • McNamara M.F.
        • Takaki H.S.
        • Yao J.S.
        • Bergan J.J.
        A systematic approach to severe hand ischemia.
        Surgery. 1978; 83: 1-11
        • Lepäntalo M.
        • Fiengo L.
        • Biancari F.
        Peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients with renal insufficiency: a review.
        Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012; 28: 40-45
        • Blazar P.E.
        • Garon M.T.
        Ray resections of the fingers: indications, techniques, and outcomes.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23: 476-484
        • Peimer C.A.
        • Wheeler D.R.
        • Barrett A.
        • Goldschmidt P.G.
        Hand function following single ray amputation.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1999; 24: 1245-1248
        • Melikyan E.Y.
        • Beg M.S.
        • Woodbridge S.
        • Burke F.D.
        The functional results of ray amputation.
        Hand Surg. 2003; 8: 47-51