Advertisement
Editor's Choice|Articles in Press

Correlation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 Score and Physical Exam Maneuvers With Electrodiagnostic Test Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Blinded Prospective Cohort Study

Published:February 05, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.11.020

      Purpose

      Although carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be diagnosed clinically with the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6) evaluation tool, the relationship between disease severity and CTS-6 score has not been elucidated. The purpose of our study was to determine the correlation of the CTS-6 score and other physical examination maneuvers with the carpal tunnel severity grade by electrodiagnostic testing (EDT). We hypothesized that the CTS-6 score, Durkan test, and Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing (SWMT) positively correlate with EDT severity.

      Methods

      We prospectively enrolled 105 consecutive patients who presented to the office with suspected CTS, excluding those with previous surgery, previous EDT from an outside facility, or concomitant neuropathy. Four fellowship-trained hand surgeons obtained the CTS-6 score, time to obtain a positive Durkan compression test, and SWMT of the thumb, index, and middle fingers. All patients were sent for EDT. Hand surgeons were blinded to the results of the EDT, and the electrodiagnosticians were blinded to the clinical data. We used the Bland criteria (0–6) to grade CTS severity on EDT. This grade was compared with the CTS-6 score, Durkan time, and SWMT results.

      Results

      Using Spearman correlation coefficients, we found a weakly positive correlation between a higher CTS-6 score and a higher severity grade on EDT. The mean CTS-6 score based on EDT grading were the following: (1) 14.8 (grade 0), (2) 16.0 (grade 1), (3) 14.8 (grade 2), (4) 16.7 (grade 3), (5) 18.7 (grade 4), (6) 18.3 (grade 5), and (7) 22.4 (grade 6). We also found a statistically significant association between the SWMT and a higher CTS-6 score as well as a higher severity grade on EDT. Durkan compression test did not appear to correlate with the EDT grade.

      Conclusions

      The CTS-6 and SWMT show a positive correlation with EDT severity in CTS on the basis of the Bland criteria. The time to a positive Durkan test did not show any correlation.

      Type of study/level of evidence/Level of Evidence

      Diagnostic II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Working Group Panel
        Clinical Guidelines on Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
        • Foley M.
        • Silverstein B.
        • Pollissar N.
        The economic burden of carpal tunnel syndrome: long term earnings of CTS claimants in Washington State.
        Am J Ind Med. 2007; 50: 155-172
        • Graham B.
        The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 2587-2593
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Cipolli W.
        • Hanson T.
        A comparison of three diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1958-1961
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Munsch M.
        • Tosti R.
        • Hagberg W.C.
        • Imbriglia J.E.
        Comparison of ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: study using a validated clinical tool as the reference standard.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: e148
        • Wang W.L.
        • Buterbaugh K.
        • Kadow T.R.
        • Goitz R.J.
        • Fowler J.R.
        A prospective comparison of diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 43: 833-836.e2
        • Grundberg A.B.
        Carpal tunnel decompression in spite of normal electromyography.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1983; 8: 348-349
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Byrne K.
        • Pan T.
        • Goitz R.J.
        False-positive rates for nerve conduction studies and ultrasound in patients without clinical signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44: 181-185
        • Glowacki K.A.
        • Breen C.J.
        • Sachar K.
        • Weiss A.P.
        Electrodiagnostic testing and carpal tunnel release outcome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21: 117-121
        • Jablecki C.K.
        • Andary M.T.
        • So Y.T.
        • Wilkins D.E.
        • Williams F.H.
        Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee.
        Muscle Nerve. 1993; 16: 1392-1414
        • Kronlage S.C.
        • Menendez M.E.
        The benefit of carpal tunnel release in patients with electrophysiologically moderate and severe disease.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40: 438-444.e1
        • Braun R.M.
        • Jackson W.J.
        Electrical studies as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19: 893-900
        • Rivlin M.
        • Kachooei A.R.
        • Wang M.L.
        • Ilyas A.M.
        Electrodiagnostic grade and carpal tunnel release outcomes: a prospective analysis.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 43: 425-431
        • Durkan J.A.
        A new diagnostic test for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73 (Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74(2):311): 535-538
        • Bland J.D.
        Do nerve conduction studies predict the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression?.
        Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24: 935-940
        • Keith M.W.
        • Masear V.
        • Chung K.C.
        • et al.
        American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 2478-2479
        • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
        Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.
        • Billig J.I.
        • Kotsis S.V.
        • Chung K.C.
        • M-CHIQS Collaborators
        Variation in use of electrodiagnostic testing: analysis from the Michigan collaborative hand initiative for quality in surgery.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2021; 46: 169-177
        • Atroshi I.
        • Lyrén P.E.
        • Ornstein E.
        • Gummesson C.
        The six-item CTS symptoms scale and palmar pain scale in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 788-794