Advertisement

Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life of Adults With Congenital Below-Elbow Amputation in North America

Published:August 27, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.07.003

      Purpose

      Congenital below-elbow amputation (BEA) is a common upper-extremity anomaly and generally encompasses 2 diagnoses, symbrachydactyly and transverse deficiency. Little is known about the physical, mental, and social well-being of adults with congenital BEA. A deeper understanding of longitudinal outcomes within this population may help guide family conversations and counseling for patients with congenital BEA.

      Methods

      The Shriners Hospitals for Children Health Outcomes Network was queried to identify all patients currently >18 years of age who had been seen as a child between 1975 and 2019 for congenital BEA at 1 of 20 Shriners Hospitals across North America. A unique health survey examining physical functioning, mental health, social outcomes, and health-related quality of life was constructed and sent by mail or in electronic form to eligible patients.

      Results

      A total of 64 questionnaires were completed. Patients ranged between 18 and 34 years of age, and 70% were female. Nearly two-thirds of patients (64%) reported that a prosthesis was not required and only 14% reported daily prosthetic use. Although respondents reported below-average Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper-extremity scores, there were no differences in Short-Form 12 or Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores relative to the US general population. Study participants had lower PROMIS Pain Intensity and higher PROMIS satisfaction with social roles and activities scores than the US general population, translating to clinically meaningful differences.

      Conclusions

      Although adults with congenital BEA report lower upper-extremity functional scores than the general population, they report no clear differences from normative values in self-efficacy, psychosocial well-being, health-related quality of life, or global life satisfaction.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Prognostic IV.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hoyme H.E.
        • Jones K.L.
        • Van Allen M.I.
        • Saunders B.S.
        • Benirschke K.
        Vascular pathogenesis of transverse limb reduction defects.
        J Pediatr. 1982; 101: 839-843
        • Riddle R.D.
        • Tabin C.
        How limbs develop.
        Sci Am. 1999; 280: 74-79
        • Daluiski A.
        • Yi S.E.
        • Lyons K.M.
        The molecular control of upper extremity development: implications for congenital hand anomalies.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26: 8-22
        • Oberg K.C.
        • Feenstra J.M.
        • Manske P.R.
        • Tonkin M.A.
        Developmental biology and classification of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper extremity.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35: 2066-2076
        • Ezaki M.
        • Baek G.H.
        • Hovius S.E.
        IFSSH scientific committee on congenital conditions: classification of congenital hand and upper limb anomalies.
        IFSSH Ezine. 2014; 4: 14-16
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        • Shaw N.
        • Steffen J.A.
        • Wall L.B.
        The prevalence of congenital hand and upper extremity anomalies based upon the New York Congenital Malformations Registry.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2017; 37: 144-148
        • Ekblom A.G.
        • Laurell T.
        • Arner M.
        Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in 562 children born in 1997 to 2007: a total population study from Stockholm, Sweden.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35: 1742-1754
        • Krebs D.E.
        • Fishman S.
        Characteristics of the child amputee population.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 1984; 4: 89-95
        • Edmonds L.D.
        • Layde P.M.
        • James L.M.
        • Flynt J.W.
        • Erickson J.D.
        • Oakley Jr., G.P.
        Congenital malformations surveillance: two American systems.
        Int J Epidemiol. 1981; 10: 247-252
        • Davids J.R.
        • Wagner L.V.
        • Meyer L.C.
        • Blackhurst D.W.
        Prosthetic management of children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1294-1300
        • Sheffler L.C.
        • Hanley C.
        • Bagley A.
        • Molitor F.
        • James M.A.
        Comparison of self-reports and parent proxy-reports of function and quality of life of children with below-the-elbow deficiency.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 2852-2859
        • Johansen H.
        • Dammann B.
        • Øinæs Andersen L.O.
        • Andresen I.L.
        Children with congenital limb deficiency in Norway: issues related to school life and health-related quality of life. A cross-sectional study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38: 1803-1810
        • James M.A.
        • Bagley A.M.
        • Brasington K.
        • Lutz C.
        • McConnell S.
        • Molitor F.
        Impact of prostheses on function and quality of life for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 2356-2365
        • Huizing K.
        • Reinders-Messelink H.
        • Maathuis C.
        • Hadders-Algra M.
        • van der Sluis C.K.
        Age at first prosthetic fitting and later functional outcome in children and young adults with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency: a cross-sectional study.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010; 34: 166-174
        • Buffart L.M.
        • Roebroeck M.E.
        • van Heijningen V.G.
        • Pesch-Batenburg J.M.
        • Stam H.J.
        Evaluation of arm and prosthetic functioning in children with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency of the upper limb.
        J Rehabil Med. 2007; 39: 379-386
        • Buffart L.M.
        • Roebroeck M.E.
        • Pesch-Batenburg J.M.
        • Janssen W.G.
        • Stam H.J.
        Assessment of arm/hand functioning in children with a congenital transverse or longitudinal reduction deficiency of the upper limb.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 85-95
        • Kuyper M.A.
        • Breedijk M.
        • Mulders A.H.
        • Post M.W.
        • Prevo A.J.
        Prosthetic management of children in the Netherlands with upper limb deficiencies.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001; 25: 228-234
        • Bagley A.M.
        • Molitor F.
        • Wagner L.V.
        • Tomhave W.
        • James M.A.
        The Unilateral Below Elbow Test: a function test for children with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006; 48: 569-575
        • Pruitt S.D.
        • Varni J.W.
        • Setoguchi Y.
        Functional status in children with limb deficiency: development and initial validation of an outcome measure.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 1233-1238
        • Pruitt S.D.
        • Varni J.W.
        • Seid M.
        • Setoguchi Y.
        Functional status in limb deficiency: development of an outcome measure for preschool children.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 405-411
        • Pruitt S.D.
        • Seid M.
        • Varni J.W.
        • Setoguchi Y.
        Toddlers with limb deficiency: conceptual basis and initial application of a functional status outcome measure.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 819-824
        • Egermann M.
        • Thomsen M.
        Myoelectric prostheses for kindergarten age children. Analysis of first reactions and experiences.
        Orthopade. 2003; 32: 164-169
        • Scotland T.R.
        • Galway H.R.
        A long-term review of children with congenital and acquired upper limb deficiency.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983; 65: 346-349
        • Postema K.
        • van der Donk V.
        • van Limbeek J.
        • Rijken R.A.
        • Poelma M.J.
        Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect.
        Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13: 243-249
        • Kejlaa G.H.
        Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993; 17: 157-163
        • Pruitt S.D.
        • Varni J.W.
        • Seid M.
        • Setoguchi Y.
        Prosthesis satisfaction outcome measurement in pediatric limb deficiency.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 750-754
        • Davidson J.
        A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities.
        J Hand Ther. 2002; 15: 62-70
        • de Jong I.G.
        • Reinders-Messelink H.A.
        • Tates K.
        • et al.
        Activity and participation of children and adolescents with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency: an online focus group study.
        J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44: 885-892
        • Lankhorst I.M.F.
        • Baars E.C.T.
        • Wijk I.V.
        • Janssen W.G.M.
        • Poelma M.J.
        • van der Sluis C.K.
        Living with transversal upper limb reduction deficiency: limitations experienced by young adults during their transition to adulthood.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39: 1623-1630
        • Vasluian E.
        • de Jong I.G.
        • Janssen W.G.
        • et al.
        Opinions of youngsters with congenital below-elbow deficiency, and those of their parents and professionals concerning prosthetic use and rehabilitation treatment.
        PloS One. 2013; 8e67101
        • Johansen H.
        • Østlie K.
        • Andersen L.Ø.
        • Rand-Hendriksen S.
        Adults with congenital limb deficiency in Norway: demographic and clinical features, pain and the use of health care and welfare services. A cross-sectional study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 2076-2082
        • Johansen H.
        • Bathen T.
        • Andersen L.Ø.
        • Rand-Hendriksen S.
        • Østlie K.
        Education and work participation among adults with congenital unilateral upper limb deficiency in Norway: a cross-sectional study.
        PloS One. 2018; 13e0207846
        • Johansen H.
        • Bathen T.
        • Andersen L.Ø.
        • Rand-Hendriksen S.
        • Østlie K.
        Chronic pain and fatigue in adults with congenital unilateral upper limb deficiency in Norway. A cross-sectional study.
        PloS One. 2018; 13e0190567
        • Johansen H.
        • Østlie K.
        • Andersen L.Ø.
        • Rand-Hendriksen S.
        Health-related quality of life in adults with congenital unilateral upper limb deficiency in Norway. A cross-sectional study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38: 2305-2314
        • Krantz O.
        • Bolin K.
        • Persson D.
        Stigma-handling strategies in everyday life among women aged 20 to 30 with transversal upper limb reduction deficiency.
        Scand J Disabil Res. 2008; 10: 209-226
        • Postema S.G.
        • Bongers R.M.
        • Brouwers M.A.
        • et al.
        Musculoskeletal complaints in transverse upper limb reduction deficiency and amputation in the Netherlands: prevalence, predictors, and effect on health.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97: 1137-1145
        • World Health Organization
        Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946.
        in: World Health Organization, ed. Constitution of the World Health Organization. World Health Organization, 1948: 2
        • Sherbourne C.D.
        • Stewart A.L.
        The MOS social support survey.
        Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32: 705-714
        • Burckhardt C.S.
        • Anderson K.L.
        The Quality of Life Scale (QoLS): reliability, validity, and utilization.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003; 1: 60
        • Pavot W.G.
        • Diener E.
        Review of the satisfaction with life scale.
        Psychol Assess. 1993; 5: 164-172
        • Diener E.
        • Emmons R.A.
        • Larsen R.J.
        • Griffin S.
        The satisfaction with life scale.
        J Pers Assess. 1985; 49: 71-75
        • Northwestern University
        PROMIS.
        • Ware Jr., J.E.
        • Kosinski M.
        • Keller S.D.
        SF-12: how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales.
        QualityMetric Incorporated, 1995
        • Ware Jr., J.
        • Kosinski M.
        • Keller S.D.
        A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.
        Med Care. 1996; 34: 220-233
        • Hunsaker F.G.
        • Cioffi D.A.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Wright J.G.
        • Caughlin B.
        The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 208-215
        • Kennedy C.A.
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Solway S.
        • McConnell S.
        • Bombardier C.
        The DASH outcome measure user’s manual.
        3rd ed. Institute for Work & Health, 2011
        • Harvard Medical School
        National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). Data Table 1: Lifetime Prevalence DSM-IV/WMH-CIDI Disorders by Sex and Cohort.
        • Mayol-Garcia Y.
        • Gurrentz B.
        • Kreider R.M.
        Number, Timing, and Duration of Marriages and Divorces.
        • United States Census Bureau
        Educational Attainment in the United States: 2019.
        • US Bureau of Labor Statistics
        Current Employment Statistics – CES (National).
        https://www.bls.gov/ces
        Date accessed: November 8, 2021
        • US Bureau of Labor Statistics
        Median Usual Weekly Earnings of Full-Time Wage and Salary Workers by Age, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Sex, Third Quarter 2021 Averages, Not Seasonally Adjusted.
        • Broderick J.E.
        • Schneider S.
        • Junghaenel D.U.
        • Schwartz J.E.
        • Stone A.A.
        Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis.
        Arthritis Care Res Hoboken. 2013; 65: 1625-1633
        • Khutok K.
        • Janwantanakul P.
        • Jensen M.P.
        • Kanlayanaphotporn R.
        Responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 scales in individuals with chronic low back pain.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46: 107-113
        • Purvis T.E.
        • Neuman B.J.
        • Riley III, L.H.
        • Skolasky R.L.
        Discriminant ability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients with lumbar degenerative disease undergoing decompression with or without arthrodesis.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43: 1512-1520
      1. Ibaseta A, Rahman R, Andrade NS, et al. Determining validity, discriminant ability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important differences for PROMIS in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. Published online February 19, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.8.SPINE191551

        • Pavot W.
        • Diener E.
        • Colvin C.R.
        • Sandvik E.
        Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures.
        J Pers Assess. 1991; 57: 149-161
        • Pavot W.
        • Diener E.
        The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being.
        Soc Indic Res. 1993; 28: 1-20
        • Burckhardt C.S.
        • Woods S.L.
        • Schultz A.A.
        • Ziebarth D.M.
        Quality of life of adults with chronic illness: a psychometric study.
        Res Nurs Health. 1989; 12: 347-354
        • Burckhardt C.S.
        • Archenholtz B.
        • Bjelle A.
        Measuring the quality of life of women with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus: a Swedish version of the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS).
        Scand J Rheumatol. 1992; 21: 190-195
        • Anderson K.L.
        The effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on quality of life.
        Res Nurs Health. 1995; 18: 547-556
        • Dantas R.A.P.
        • Motzer S.A.
        • Ciol M.A.
        The relationship between quality of life, sense of coherence and self-esteem in persons after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2002; 39: 745-755
        • Hägg O.
        • Burckhardt C.S.
        • Fritzell P.
        • Nordwall A.
        Quality of life in chronic low back pain: a comparison with fibromyalgia and the general population.
        J Musculoskelet Pain. 2003; 11: 31-38
        • London D.A.
        • Stepan J.G.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Calfee R.P.
        The impact of depression and pain catastrophization on initial presentation and treatment outcomes for atraumatic hand conditions.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 806-814
        • Wylie J.D.
        • Suter T.
        • Potter M.Q.
        • Granger E.K.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        Mental health has a stronger association with patient-reported shoulder pain and function than tear size in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98: 251-256
        • Schippers S.M.
        • Reist H.
        • An Q.
        • Buckwalter J.A.
        Natural history of Poland syndrome: a long-term study of functional and psychosocial outcomes.
        Hand (N Y). 2022; 17: 684-690
        • Taghinia A.H.
        • Yorlets R.R.
        • Doyle M.
        • Labow B.I.
        • Upton J.
        Long-term functional upper-extremity outcomes in adults with Apert syndrome.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 1136-1145
        • Holtslag I.
        • van Wijk I.
        • Hartog H.
        • van der Molen A.M.
        • van der Sluis C.
        Long-term functional outcome of patients with longitudinal radial deficiency: cross-sectional evaluation of function, activity and participation.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2013; 35: 1401-1407