Advertisement

Intraoperative Conversion From Endoscopic to Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review and Case Series

Published:August 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.020

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, outcomes, and complications associated with conversion from endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) to open carpal tunnel release (OCTR).

      Methods

      A retrospective case review of all patients who underwent ECTR over 4 years by 2 fellowship-trained hand surgeons at a single academic center was performed. We recorded outcomes and the reason for conversion in patients who underwent conversion to an OCTR. Baseline demographics and surgical complications were compared between the 2 groups. A systematic review was performed to define the incidence and reasons for conversion from ECTR to OCTR. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we included clinical studies of ECTR from 2000 to 2021.

      Results

      In the retrospective series, 9 of 892 (1.02%) ECTR cases underwent conversion to an OCTR at the time of the index procedure. One of 9 converted cases had transient neurapraxia involving the recurrent motor branch after surgery compared with 0 cases in the group that underwent ECTR without conversion. Improvements in the visual analog scale for pain and QuickDASH were noted at a mean of 46 weeks after surgery in the group that underwent conversion to OCTR. The systematic review identified an incidence of conversion of 0.62%. The most common reasons for conversion to OCTR in the case series and systematic review were poor visualization due to hypertrophic tenosynovium and aberrant nerve anatomy.

      Conclusions

      The overall incidence of intraoperative conversion from ECTR to OCTR during the index procedure was 1.02%, with the most common reasons for conversion being poor visualization due to hypertrophic tenosynovium and aberrant nerve anatomy. Patients who undergo conversion from ECTR to OCTR demonstrate improvements in pain and disability, similar to patients who undergo ECTR without conversion.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Therapeutic IV.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Leinberry C.F.
        • Rivlin M.
        • Maltenfort M.
        • et al.
        Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand: a 25-year perspective.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37: 1997-2003.e3
        • Chen L.
        • Duan X.
        • Huang X.
        • Lv J.
        • Peng K.
        • Xiang Z.
        Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel decompression.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134: 585-593
        • Devana S.K.
        • Jensen A.R.
        • Yamaguchi K.T.
        • et al.
        Trends and complications in open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release in private payer and Medicare patient populations.
        HAND (NY). 2019; 14: 455-461
        • Murphy R.X.
        • Jennings J.F.
        • Wukich D.K.
        Major neurovascular complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19: 114-118
        • Miles M.R.
        • Shetty P.N.
        • Bhayana K.
        • Yousaf I.S.
        • Sanghavi K.K.
        • Giladi A.M.
        Early outcomes of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2021; 46: 868-876
        • Li Y.
        • Luo W.
        • Wu G.
        • Cui S.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Gu X.
        Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21: 272
        • Wessel L.E.
        • Gu A.
        • Asadourian P.A.
        • Stepan J.G.
        • Fufa D.T.
        • Osei D.A.
        The epidemiology of carpal tunnel revision over a 1-year follow-up period.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2021; 46: 758-764
        • Brodeur P.G.
        • Raducha J.E.
        • Patel D.D.
        • Cruz Jr., A.I.
        • Gil J.A.
        Cost drivers in carpal tunnel release surgery: an analysis of 8,717 patients in New York state.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2022; 47: 258-265.e1
        • Koehler D.M.
        • Balakrishnan R.
        • Lawler E.A.
        • Shah A.S.
        Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a detailed analysis using time-driven activity-based costing at an academic medical center.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44: 62.e1-62.e9
        • Grandizio L.C.
        • Zhang H.
        • Dwyer C.L.
        • Goldberg S.H.
        • Klena J.C.
        Opioid versus nonopioid analgesia after carpal tunnel release: A randomized, prospective study.
        HAND (NY). 2021; 16: 38-44
        • Alter T.H.
        • Ilyas A.M.
        A prospective randomized study analyzing preoperative opioid counseling in pain management after carpal tunnel release surgery.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42: 810-815
        • Beck J.D.
        • Deegan J.H.
        • Rhoades D.
        • Klena J.C.
        Results of endoscopic carpal tunnel release relative to surgeon experience with the Agee technique.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 61-64
        • Schonauer F.
        • Varma S.
        • Belcher H.J.
        Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: practice in evolution.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003; 37: 360-364
        • Foucher G.
        • Van Overstraeten L.
        • Braga da Silva J.
        • Nolens D.
        Changes in grip strength in a randomized study of carpal tunnel release by three different techniques.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 1996; 6: 185-189
        • Uchiyama S.
        • Toriumi H.
        • Nakagawa H.
        • Kamimura M.
        • Ishigaki N.
        • Miyasaka T.
        Postoperative nerve conduction changes after open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113: 64-70
        • Hankins C.L.
        • Brown M.G.
        • Lopez R.A.
        • Lee A.K.
        • Dang J.
        • Harper R.D.
        A 12-year experience using the Brown two-portal endoscopic procedure of transverse carpal ligament release in 14,722 patients: defining a new paradigm in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 1911-1921
        • McNally S.A.
        • Hales P.F.
        Results of 1245 endoscopic carpal tunnel decompressions.
        Hand Surg. 2003 Jul; 8: 111-116
      1. Meyer MA, Tarabochia MA, Goh BC, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Dyer GS. The impact of resident involvement on outcomes and costs in elective hand and upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am. Published online April 20, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.006

        • Kazmers N.H.
        • Hung M.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Voss M.W.
        • Howenstein A.
        • Tyser A.R.
        Minimal clinically important difference after carpal tunnel release using the PROMIS platform.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44: 947-953.e1
        • Michael P.G.
        • Meredith N.O.
        • Eon K.S.
        • Arthur L.O.
        • Patrick M.K.
        Sleep disturbance and response to surgical decompression in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized pilot comparison of open versus endoscopic release.
        Acta Biomed. 2019; 90: 92-96
        • Henry B.M.
        • Zwinczewska H.
        • Roy J.
        • Vikse J.
        • Ramakrishnan P.K.
        • Walocha J.A.
        • et al.
        The prevalence of anatomical variations of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0136477
        • Kozin S.H.
        The anatomy of the recurrent branch of the median nerve.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23: 852-858
        • Benson L.S.
        • Bare A.A.
        • Nagle D.J.
        • Harder V.S.
        • Williams C.S.
        • Visotsky J.L.
        Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.
        J Arthro Relat Surg. 2006; 22: 919-924