Advertisement
Editor's Choice| Volume 47, ISSUE 10, P944-952, October 2022

The Utility of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-6 for Predicting the Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Release

Published:August 05, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.017

      Purpose

      Considering the cost of, discomfort with, and time required for nerve conduction testing, the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-6 (CTS-6) is often used to determine the likelihood of the presence of carpal tunnel syndrome. We sought to determine whether the CTS-6, designed as a diagnostic instrument, could serve a dual purpose and predict the outcome of carpal tunnel release (CTR) based on postoperative changes in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) score.

      Methods

      This prospective observational study enrolled 118 adults before they underwent open CTR at a tertiary center. A primary regression analysis was used to determine the association between preoperative CTS-6 scores and changes in the BCTQ score at ≥6 months after surgery. Additional demographic, social, electrodiagnostic, and mental health variables were assessed for associations with changes in the BCTQ score. The secondary outcomes included single questions rating satisfaction with the result of CTR as well as symptom changes and the Decision Regret Scale. Noneffective CTR was defined as a BCTQ score change of <1.0 point or reported dissatisfaction.

      Results

      Postoperatively, the BCTQ score improvement averaged 1.38 ± 0.77. Although 102 of 109 patients (94%) noted symptom improvement, 94 of 109 (86%) were satisfied with the result of CTR, and 78 of 109 patients (72%) demonstrated a meaningful change in the BCTQ score. Preoperative CTS-6 scores were not correlated with changes in BCTQ scores. CTS-6 scores were not associated with Decision Regret Scale scores, reported satisfaction, or the single-question assessment of symptom changes. Satisfaction, decision regret, and the single symptom change question were correlated with changes in the BCTQ score and each other. Dissatisfied patients were distinguished by a differential improvement in the BCTQ score (1.5 vs 0.7), but no preoperative variable consistently predicted noneffective CTR.

      Conclusions

      The CTS-6 score does not predict changes in BCTQ scores after CTR. Patient satisfaction with surgical results is associated with postoperative changes in carpal tunnel symptoms but is not predictable using preoperative information. A single question of symptom change may offer an efficient assessment of CTR outcomes.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Prognostic II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Graham B.
        • Regehr G.
        • Naglie G.
        • Wright J.G.
        Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31: 919-924
        • Graham B.
        The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 2587-2593
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Cipolli W.
        • Hanson T.
        A comparison of three diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1958-1961
        • Concannon M.J.
        • Gainor B.
        • Petroski G.F.
        • Puckett C.L.
        The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1452-1458
        • Grundberg A.B.
        Carpal tunnel decompression in spite of normal electromyography.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1983; 8: 348-349
        • Glowacki K.A.
        • Breen C.J.
        • Sachar K.
        • Weiss A.P.
        Electrodiagnostic testing and carpal tunnel release outcome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21: 117-121
        • Naranjo A.
        • Ojeda S.
        • Araña V.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of clinical findings, nerve conduction studies and ultrasonography to predict response to surgical release in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009; 27: 786-793
        • Louie D.
        • Earp B.
        • Blazar P.
        Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: a critical review of the literature.
        Hand (N Y). 2012; 7: 242-246
        • Katz J.N.
        • Losina E.
        • Amick III, B.C.
        • Fossel A.H.
        • Bessette L.
        • Keller R.B.
        Predictors of outcomes of carpal tunnel release.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44: 1184-1193
        • Wintman B.I.
        • Winters S.C.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Katz J.N.
        Carpal tunnel release: correlations with preoperative symptomatology.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; : 135-145
        • Prick J.J.
        • Blaauw G.
        • Vredeveld J.W.
        • Oosterloo S.J.
        Results of carpal tunnel release.
        Eur J Neurol. 2003; 10: 733-736
        • Bland J.D.
        Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Muscle Nerve. 2007; 36: 167-171
        • Bland J.D.
        Do nerve conduction studies predict the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression?.
        Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24: 935-940
        • Tang C.Q.
        • Lai S.W.
        • Tay S.C.
        Long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Bone Joint J. 2017; 99: 1348-1353
        • Gerritsen A.A.
        • De Vet H.C.
        • Scholten R.J.
        • Bertelsmann F.W.
        • De Krom M.C.
        • Bouter L.M.
        Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 1245-1251
        • Choi S.J.
        • Ahn D.S.
        Correlation of clinical history and electrodiagnostic abnormalities with outcome after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 2374-2380
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Munsch M.
        • Huang Y.
        • Hagberg W.C.
        • Imbriglia J.E.
        Pre-operative electrodiagnostic testing predicts time to resolution of symptoms after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016; 41: 137-142
        • Yu G.Z.
        • Firrell J.C.
        • Tsai T.M.
        Pre-operative factors and treatment outcome following carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1992; 17: 646-650
        • Jansen M.C.
        • Evers S.
        • Slijper H.P.
        • et al.
        Predicting clinical outcome after surgical treatment in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 43: 1098-1106
        • Lo Y.L.
        • Lim S.H.
        • Fook-Chong S.
        • Lum S.Y.
        • Teoh L.C.
        • Yong F.C.
        Outcome prediction value of nerve conduction studies for endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery.
        J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2012; 13: 153-158
        • Hrkovic M.
        • Lazovic M.
        • Nikolic D.
        • Nikcevic L.
        • Ilic-Stojanovic O.
        • Filipovic T.
        Functional status measured by Levine questionnaire in surgically and conservatively treated patients with carpal tunnel syndrome regarding nerve conduction studies.
        Ann Ital Chir. 2016; 87: 247-251
        • Dennerlein J.T.
        • Soumekh F.S.
        • Fossel A.H.
        • Amick III, B.C.
        • Keller R.B.
        • Katz J.N.
        Longer distal motor latency predicts better outcomes of carpal tunnel release.
        J Occup Environ Med. 2002; 44: 176-183
        • Conzen C.
        • Conzen M.
        • Rubsamen N.
        • Mikolajczyk R.
        Predictors of the patient-centered outcomes of surgical carpal tunnel release—a prospective cohort study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 1-10
        • Longstaff L.
        • Milner R.H.
        • O'Sullivan S.
        • Fawcett P.
        Carpal tunnel syndrome: the correlation between outcome, symptoms and nerve conduction study findings.
        J Hand Surg Br. 2001; 26: 475-480
        • Becker S.J.
        • Makanji H.S.
        • Ring D.
        Expected and actual improvement of symptoms with carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37: 1324-1329
        • Braun R.M.
        • Jackson W.J.
        Electrical studies as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19: 893-900
        • Al-Qattan M.M.
        • Bowen V.
        • Manktelow R.T.
        Factors associated with poor outcome following primary carpal tunnel release in non-diabetic patients.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1994; 19: 622-625
        • Harris P.A.
        • Taylor R.
        • Thielke R.
        • Payne J.
        • Gonzalez N.
        • Conde J.G.
        Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381
        • Levine D.W.
        • Simmons B.P.
        • Koris M.J.
        • et al.
        A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 1585-1592
        • Hadi M.
        • Gibbons E.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        Patient-reported outcome measurement group, oxford a structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome Report to the Department of Health 2011 patient-reported O U T C O M E measures.
        Med. 2013; 7136148
        • Sambandam S.N.
        • Priyanka P.
        • Gul A.
        • Ilango B.
        Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Int Orthop. 2008; 32: 497-504
        • Katz J.N.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Wright E.A.
        • Lew R.A.
        • Liang M.H.
        Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Med Care. 1994; 32: 1127-1133
        • Katz J.N.
        • Punnett L.
        • Simmons B.P.
        • Fossel A.H.
        • Mooney N.
        • Keller R.B.
        Workers’ compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: the validity of self-reported health measures.
        Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 52-56
        • Leite J.C.
        • Jerosch-Herold C.
        • Song F.
        A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7: 1-9
        • Bessette L.
        • Sangha O.
        • Kuntz K.M.
        • et al.
        Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Med Care. 1998; 36: 491-502
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Silverstein M.D.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        • Schleck C.D.
        • Jensen L.M.
        Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21: 338-346
        • Atroshi I.
        • Breidenbach W.C.
        • McCabe S.J.
        Assessment of the carpal tunnel outcome instrument in patients with nerve-compression symptoms.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1997; 22: 222-227
        • Priganc V.W.
        • Henry S.M.
        The relationship among five common carpal tunnel syndrome tests and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Ther. 2003; 16: 225-236
        • Gay R.E.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Johnson J.C.
        Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28: 250-254
        • Bakhsh H.
        • Ibrahim I.
        • Khan W.
        • Smitham P.
        • Goddard N.
        Assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness and bias of three commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2012; 14: 335-340
        • Mehta S.P.
        • Weinstock-Zlotnick G.
        • Akland K.L.
        • Hanna M.M.
        • Workman K.J.
        Using Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in clinical practice: a systematic review of its measurement properties.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; 33: 493-506
        • Kim J.K.
        • Jeon S.H.
        Minimal clinically important differences in the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013; 38: 75-79
        • Guyette T.M.
        • Wilgis E.F.
        Timing of improvement after carpal tunnel release.
        J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004; 13: 206-209
        • Brehaut J.C.
        • O'Connor A.M.
        • Wood T.J.
        • et al.
        Validation of a decision regret scale.
        Med Decis Making. 2003; 23: 281-292
        • Goel V.
        • Sawka C.A.
        • Thiel E.C.
        • Gort E.H.
        • O'Connor A.M.
        Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.
        Med Decis Making. 2001; 21: 1-6
        • Becerra Pérez M.M.
        • Menear M.
        • Brehaut J.C.
        • Legare F.
        Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: a systematic review.
        Med Decis Making. 2016; 36: 777-790
        • Tanno K.
        • Bito S.
        • Isobe Y.
        • Takagi Y.
        Validation of a Japanese version of the decision regret scale.
        J Nurs Meas. 2016; 24: 44E-54E
        • Calderon C.
        • Ferrando P.J.
        • Lorenzo-Seva U.
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of the decision regret scale in cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019; 57: 828-834
        • Kleiss II,
        • Kortlever J.T.
        • Ring D.
        • Vagner G.A.
        • Reichel L.M.
        A randomized controlled trial of decision aids for upper-extremity conditions.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2021; 46: 338.e1-338.e15
        • Wilkens S.C.
        • Ring D.
        • Teunis T.
        • Lee S.P.
        • Chen N.C.
        Decision aid for trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44: 247.e1-247.e9
        • Lonner B.
        • Castillo A.
        • Jain A.
        • et al.
        The patient generated index and decision regret in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
        Spine Deform. 2020; 8: 1231-1238
        • Sepucha K.R.
        • Atlas S.J.
        • Chang Y.
        • et al.
        Informed, patient-centered decisions associated with better health outcomes in orthopedics: prospective cohort study.
        Med Decis Making. 2018; 38: 1018-1026
        • Evans J.D.
        Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
        Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, 1996
        • Kulick M.I.
        • Gordillo G.
        • Javidi T.
        • Kilgore Jr., E.S.
        • Newmayer III, W.L.
        Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1986; 11: 59-66
        • Gong H.S.
        • Oh J.H.
        • Bin S.W.
        • Kim W.S.
        • Chung M.S.
        • Baek G.H.
        Clinical features influencing the patient-based outcome after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 1512-1517
        • Gire J.D.
        • Koltsov J.C.
        • Segovia N.A.
        • Kenney D.E.
        • Yao J.
        • Ladd A.L.
        Single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) in hand surgery: does a one-question outcome instrument compare favorably?.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2020; 45: 589-596
        • London D.A.
        • Stepan J.G.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Calfee R.P.
        The impact of depression and pain catastrophization on initial presentation and treatment outcomes for atraumatic hand conditions.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 806-814
        • Cochrane S.K.
        • Calfee R.P.
        • Stonner M.M.
        • Dale A.M.
        The relationship between depression, anxiety, and pain interference with therapy referral and utilization among patients with hand conditions.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; 35: 24-31
        • Crijns T.J.
        • Bernstein D.N.
        • Ring D.
        • Gonzalez R.M.
        • Wilbur D.M.
        • Hammert W.C.
        Depression and pain Interference correlate with physical function in patients recovering from hand surgery.
        Hand (N Y). 2019; 14: 830-835
        • Vranceanu A.M.
        • Jupiter J.B.
        • Mudgal C.S.
        • Ring D.
        Predictors of pain intensity and disability after minor hand surgery.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35: 956-960
        • Calderón S.A.
        • Paiva A.
        • Ring D.
        Patient satisfaction after open carpal tunnel release correlates with depression.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 303-307
        • The Bureau of Labor Statistics
        Number, Median Days, Incidence Rate and Relative Standard Errors of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses with Days Away.
        https://www.bls.gov/
        Date accessed: October 1, 2021