Advertisement

Modified Radiographic Classification System for Congenital Thumb Duplication: An Analysis of 2,300 Thumbs in 2,108 Children

Published:August 05, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.001

      Purpose

      The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the radiographic characteristics of children with congenital thumb duplication (CTD) seen in our institution between August 2015 and April 2021; (2) introduce a modified radiographic classification system (MCS) capable of including all cases of CTD based on their radiographic pathoanatomy; and (3) evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the new classification system.

      Methods

      We retrospectively reviewed 2,108 patients with 2,300 CTDs. The MCS is based on the Wassel-Flatt and Chung et al classification systems and includes specific subtypes from the Rotterdam and modified Wassel-Flatt classifications. The MCS is characterized by 4 groups according to the anatomical morphology of the duplication: A (joint), B (epiphysis), C (bone), and D (soft tissues). Each group includes 4 subtypes according to the location of the CTD, with subtypes 1–3 extending from the distal phalanx to the metacarpal or interphalangeal joints, then to the carpometacarpal joint, and with subtype 4 only including the triphalangia of the main thumb.

      Results

      Among the 2,300 fingers, 360 (15.7%), 2 (0.1%), and 3 (0.1%) CTDs could not be classified according to the Wassel-Flatt, Chung et al, and Rotterdam classifications, respectively. According to the MCS, the 2 most common forms of CTD were A2 (680/2,300; 29.6%) and D2 (308/2,300; 13.4%). All cases could be classified according to this classification system. The MCS showed excellent intrarater (0.875) and interrater (0.851) reliability relative to the Wassel-Flatt (0.863 and 0.820, respectively), Chung et al (0.793 and 0.822, respectively), and Rotterdam (0.873 and 0.836, respectively) systems.

      Conclusions

      The MCS is a potential radiographic classification for CTD that enables the classification of all patients and has excellent inter- and intrarater reliability.

      Clinical relevance

      Existing classification systems do not allow classification of the full spectrum of CTD and are not always related to surgery, and some existing systems are complex, with many categories that are rarely encountered, or are difficult to use widely in clinical practice.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Van Wyhe R.D.
        • Trost J.G.
        • Koshy J.C.
        • Pederson W.C.
        The duplicated thumb: a review.
        Semin Plast Surg. 2016; 30: 181-188
        • Wassel H.D.
        The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb.
        Clin Orthop. 1969; 64: 175-193
        • Lin S.
        • Tong K.
        • Zhang G.
        • Cao S.
        • Zhong Z.
        • Wang G.
        Clinical characteristics and distribution of thumb polydactyly in south China: a retrospective analysis of 483 hands.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2020; 45: 938-946
        • Hung L.
        • Cheng J.C.
        • Bundoc R.
        • Leung P.
        Thumb duplication at the metacarpophalangeal joint: management and a new classification.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 323: 31-41
        • Zuidam J.M.
        • Selles R.W.
        • Ananta M.
        • Runia J.
        • Hovius S.E.
        A classification system of radial polydactyly: inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 373-377
        • Chung M.S.
        • Baek G.H.
        • Gong H.S.
        • Lee H.J.
        • Kim J.
        • Rhee S.H.
        Radial polydactyly: proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2013; 33: 190-196
        • Su S.
        • Chen Z.B.
        • Huang Q.S.
        • et al.
        A discussion the Wassel classification of congenital thumb duplication.
        Chin J Hand Surg. 2014; 30: 169-171
        • Li W.D.
        • Nan G.X.
        Epidemiological statistics of congenital polydactyly.
        Chin J Pediatr Surg. 2020; 41: 750-754
        • Koo T.K.
        • Li M.Y.
        A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163
        • Hu C.H.
        • Thompson E.R.
        • Agel J.
        • et al.
        A comparative analysis of 150 thumb polydactyly cases from the could registry using the Wassel-Flatt, Rotterdam, and Chung classifications.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2021; 46: 17-26
        • Yen C.H.
        • Chan W.L.
        • Leung H.B.
        • Mak K.H.
        Thumb polydactyly: clinical outcome after reconstruction.
        J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006; 14: 295-302
        • Ozalp T.
        • Coşkunol E.
        • Ozdemir O.
        Thumb duplication: an analysis of 72 thumbs.
        Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2006; 40: 388-391
        • Islam S.
        • Oka I.
        • Fujita S.
        Anatomical study of preaxial polydactyly in 158 hands.
        Tohoku J Exp Med. 1992; 168: 459-466
        • Maillet M.
        • Fron D.
        • Martinot-Duquennoy V.
        • Herbaux B.
        Results after surgical treatment of thumb duplication: a retrospective review of 33 thumbs.
        J Child Orthop. 2007; 1: 135-141
        • Evanson B.J.
        • Hosseinzadeh P.
        • Riley S.A.
        • Burgess R.C.
        Radial polydactyly and the incidence of reoperation using a new classification system.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2016; 36: 158-160
        • Tada K.
        • Yonenobu K.
        • Tsuyuguchi Y.
        • Kawai H.
        • Egawa T.
        Duplication of the thumb. A retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 584-598
        • Kim J.K.
        • Al-Dhafer B.A.A.
        • Shin Y.H.
        • Joo H.S.
        Polydactyly of the thumb: a modification of the Wassel-Flatt classification.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021; 46: 346-351
        • Wood V.E.
        Polydactyly and the triphalangeal thumb.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1978; 3: 436-444
        • Dijkman R.R.
        • van Nieuwenhoven C.A.
        • Selles R.W.
        • Habenicht R.
        • Hovius S.E.R.
        A multicenter comparative study of two classification systems for radial polydactyly.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134: 991-1001