Purpose
The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of 6 different commercially available
waterproof cast protectors in their ability to maintain a dry environment and evaluate
whether cast protectors perform better than a plastic bag secured with tape in keeping
casts dry.
Methods
We enrolled 23 adult participants to test 6 different commercially available cast
protectors and a plastic bag. Participants trialed all cast protectors twice, with
and without motion, by fully submerging each cast protector in water with a paper
towel held between their index and middle fingers. Moisture accumulation within the
cast protectors was estimated by the change in weight of paper towel. An analysis
of variance test was performed to compare differences between cast protectors in their
ability to maintain a dry internal environment.
Results
The plastic bag showed an average moisture accumulation of 5.50 g without motion compared
with all other cast protectors, which had 0.0 g of moisture accumulation. One cast
protector and the plastic bag had an average moisture accumulation of 0.46 g and 4.51
g with motion compared to all other cast protectors. The plastic bag was ranked the
worst by 100% of participants.
Conclusion
Cast protectors appear to offer superior protection from moisture compared with a
plastic bag.
Type of study/level of evidence
Therapeutic IV.
Key words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Hand SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 290-297
- Decreasing incidence and changing pattern of childhood fractures: a population-based study.J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25: 2752-2759
- The epidemiology of fractures in children.Injury. 2007; 38: 913-922
- Fractures in children: epidemiology and activity-specific fracture rates.J Bone Joint Surg. 2013; 95: e42
- Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Volume 2. Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015: 155-194
- Alternatives to traditional cast immobilization in pediatric patients.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020; 28: e20-e27
- Patient compliance with postoperative lower-extremity non-weight-bearing restrictions.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98: 1563-1567
- Incidence and etiology of unplanned cast changes for fractures in the pediatric population.J Pediatr Orthop. 2014; 34: 643-646
- Emergency room visits by pediatric fracture patients treated with cast immobilization.J Pediatr Orthop. 2010; 30: 248-252
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Care of Casts and Splints. Accessed January 27, 2021. https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/recovery/care-of-casts-and-splints/.
- Cast application techniques for common pediatric injuries: a review.Curr Orthop Pract. 2020; 31: 277-287
- A comparison of various contemporary methods to prevent a wet cast.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: e99
- Serious infectious complications related to extremity cast/splint placement in children.J Emerg Med. 2011; 41: 47-50
Article info
Publication history
Published online: June 24, 2022
Accepted:
May 13,
2022
Received:
October 25,
2021
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofFootnotes
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.