Advertisement

Evaluating the Ability of Congenital Upper Extremity Amputees to Control a Multi-Degree of Freedom Myoelectric Prosthesis

      Purpose

      To determine whether children and adults with unilateral congenital upper limb amputation can control myoelectric prostheses with multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) using pattern recognition (PR) technology.

      Methods

      Seven participants (age 9–62 years) with unilateral congenital transradial amputation were tested on both their residual and sound side limbs to determine proficiency in controlling a virtual prosthesis using electromyographic signals captured by an array of surface electrodes that were processed using PR technology. Proficiency was measured through a virtual environment game called the target achievement control test, in which the testing protocol asked participants to match increasingly complex prosthesis postures with 1, 2, and 3 DOF.

      Results

      All the participants successfully created a PR calibration at 1, 2, and 3 DOF with their residual limb during testing, and no differences in calibration accuracy were observed when comparing the residual versus sound upper limbs. No differences were noted in the mean completion rate on the target achievement control test between the residual and sound limbs.

      Conclusions

      Participants with a congenital upper limb amputation achieved PR control calibration of multi-DOF prostheses with proficiency and quality results of PR calibration that were comparable to those of their sound limb. This capability was observed in children as well as in adults. This demonstrates the potential for children and adults with a unilateral congenital transradial amputation to benefit from myoelectric prostheses with PR control.

      Clinical relevance

      The results from this study highlight the potential for patients in this population to benefit from myoelectric prostheses with PR control. Persons with unilateral congenital upper limb amputations can be considered for provision of this technology and enrollment in future research activities.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Postema S.G.
        • van der Sluis C.K.
        • Waldenlöv K.
        • Norling Hermansson L.M.
        Body structures and physical complaints in upper limb reduction deficiency: a 24-year follow-up study.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7e49727
        • Johansen H.
        • Østlie K.
        • Andersen L.Ø.
        • Rand-Hendriksen S.
        Adults with congenital limb deficiency in Norway: demographic and clinical features, pain and the use of health care and welfare services. A cross-sectional study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 2076-2082
        • Ziegler-Graham K.
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        • Ephraim P.L.
        • Travison T.G.
        • Brookmeyer R.
        Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005–2050.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 422-429
        • Parker S.E.
        • Mai C.T.
        • Canfield M.A.
        • et al.
        Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006.
        Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010; 88: 1008-1016
        • Childress D.S.
        Historical aspects of powered limb prostheses.
        Clin J Prosthet Orthot. 1985; 9: 2-13
        • Li G.
        • Schultz A.E.
        • Kuiken T.A.
        Quantifying pattern recognition–based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010; 18: 185-192
        • Kuiken T.A.
        • Li G.
        • Lock B.A.
        • et al.
        Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms.
        JAMA. 2009; 301: 619-628
        • Hargrove L.J.
        • Scheme E.J.
        • Englehart K.B.
        • Hudgins B.S.
        Multiple binary classifications via linear discriminant analysis for improved controllability of a powered prosthesis.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010; 18: 49-57
        • Wurth S.M.
        • Hargrove L.J.
        A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts’ law style assessment procedure.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11: 1-13
        • Deeny S.
        • Chicoine C.
        • Hargrove L.
        • Parrish T.
        • Jayaraman A.
        A simple ERP method for quantitative analysis of cognitive workload in myoelectric prosthesis control and human-machine interaction.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e112091
        • Huang H.
        • Zhou P.
        • Li G.
        • Kuiken T.A.
        An analysis of EMG electrode configuration for targeted muscle reinnervation based neural machine interface.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008; 16: 37-45
        • Kryger M.
        • Schultz A.E.
        • Kuiken T.
        Pattern recognition control of multifunction myoelectric prostheses by patients with congenital transradial limb defects: a preliminary study.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011; 35: 395-401
        • Simon A.M.
        • Hargrove L.J.
        • Lock B.A.
        • Kuiken T.A.
        Target achievement control test: evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of a multifunctional upper-limb prostheses.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48: 619-627