Advertisement

Strength of Humeral and Ulnar Intramedullary Screw Fixation

Published:September 24, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.037

      Purpose

      The goal of this study was to test the pullout strength of intramedullary (IM) screws from within the humerus to establish their ability to seat an uncemented elbow arthroplasty.

      Methods

      Six humerus and 6 ulna Sawbones specimens were drilled with a drill bit diameter of 5/16 inches, and the inner cortex was hand tapped for a ⅜-16 thread. A ⅜-16 custom-made titanium screw with an outer bolt diameter of 3/8 inches and 16 threads per inch was inserted by hand into the tapped holes. The specimens were then axially tensile loaded at a rate of 5 mm per minute until either the screw began to pull out from the bone or a fracture was noted.

      Results

      Intramedullary screw fixation in the humerus achieved an average pullout strength of 1,439 pound-force (6,401 N), and IM screw fixation in the ulna achieved an average pullout strength of 882 pound-force (3,923 N). A fracture was noted in 3 humeral specimens, with 3 screws pulling out. In the ulna, the IM axial load caused a fracture in 5 specimens, and in 1 specimen, the screw pulled out.

      Conclusions

      Our findings demonstrate that IM screw fixation can create a tensile force within the screw that is greater than that required to generate the calculated level of compression between the implant and bone.

      Clinical relevance

      This may be beneficial in ensuring fixation between arthroplasty components and bone.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kim J.M.
        • Mudgal C.S.
        • Konopka J.F.
        • Jupiter J.B.
        Complications of total elbow arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19: 328-339
        • Brånemark R.
        • Berlin Ö.
        • Hagberg K.
        • Bergh P.
        • Gunterberg B.
        • Rydevik B.
        A novel osseointegrated, percutaneous prosthetic system for treatment of patients with transfemoral amputation: a prospective study of 51 patients.
        Bone Joint J. 2014; 96: 106-113
        • Turkyilmaz I.
        • Aksoy U.
        • McGlumphy E.A.
        Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10: 231-237
        • Thesleff A.
        • Brånemark R.
        • Håkansson B.
        • Ortiz-Catala M.
        Biomechanical characterisation of bone-anchored implant systems for amputation limb prostheses: a systematic review.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2018; 46: 377-391
        • Jayesh R.S.
        • Dhinakarsamy V.
        Osseointegration.
        J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7: S226
        • Hagberg K.
        • Brånemark R.
        • Gunterberg B.
        • Rydevik B.
        Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008; 32: 29-41
        • Lundberg M.
        • Hagberg K.
        • Bullington J.
        My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011; 35: 207-214
        • Mavčič B.
        • Antolič V.
        Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 689-695
        • Elfar J.
        • Menorca R.M.
        • Reed J.D.
        • Stanbury S.
        Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22: 111-120
        • Dunlap J.T.
        • Chong A.C.
        • Lucas G.L.
        • Cooke F.W.
        Structural properties of a novel design of composite analogue humeri models.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2008; 36: 1922-1926
        • Aziz M.S.
        • Tsuji M.R.
        • Nicayenzi B.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical measurements of stopping and stripping torques during screw insertion in five types of human and artificial humeri.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014; 228: 446-455
        • Perren S.M.
        Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 138: 175-196
        • Lacroix D.
        • Prendergast P.J.
        A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading.
        J Biomech. 2002; 35: 1163-1171
        • Gardner M.J.
        • van der Meulen M.
        • Demetrakopoulos D.
        • Wright T.M.
        • Myers E.R.
        • Bostrom M.P.
        In vivo cyclic axial compression affects bone healing in the mouse tibia.
        J Orthop Res. 2006; 24: 1679-1686
        • Berglundh T.
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • Lang N.P.
        • Lindhe J.
        De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14: 251-262
        • Cruess R.L.
        Osteonecrosis of bone. Current concepts as to etiology and pathogenesis.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 208: 30-39