Advertisement

Racial and Gender Discrimination in Hand Surgery Letters of Recommendation

Published:August 19, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.009

      Purpose

      We sought to evaluate hand surgery applicants’ letters of recommendations to understand whether applicant and letter writer demographics contribute to racial and gender bias.

      Methods

      All applications submitted through the American Society for Surgery of the Hand match to a single institution fellowship program for the 2017 to 2019 application cycles were analyzed using validated text analysis software. Race/ethnicity information was derived from an analysis of applicant photos using the Face Secret Pro software. Primary outcome measures were differences in communal and agentic language used in letters of recommendation, stratified by both race/ethnicity and gender.

      Results

      A total of 912 letters of recommendation were analyzed for 233 applicants (51 female and 172 male). Of these, 88 were written by female letter writers and 824 were written by male letter writers. There were 8 Black, 12 Hispanic, 36 Asian, and 167 White applicants. Letter writers used more agentic language with Asian applicants and non-White applicants overall. Female letter writers used more communal terms and were not associated with applicant race or gender.

      Conclusions

      Letters of recommendation in hand surgery demonstrate disparities in language based on race and gender.

      Clinical relevance

      Alerting letter writers to the role of implicit bias will hopefully spur a discussion on tools to mitigate the use of biased language and provide a foundation for an equitable selection process. Efforts to improve policies and procedures pertaining to diversity and inclusion are paramount to ensuring that fellows more completely represent the population hand surgeons wish to serve.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Egro F.M.
        • Vangala S.K.
        • Nguyen V.T.
        • Spiess A.M.
        Hand surgery fellowship selection criteria: a national fellowship director survey.
        Arch Plast Surg. 2017; 44: 428-433
        • Lin F.
        • Oh S.K.
        • Gordon L.K.
        • Pineles S.L.
        • Rosenberg J.B.
        • Tsui I.
        Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants.
        BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19: 476
        • Filippou P.
        • Mahajan S.
        • Deal A.
        • et al.
        The presence of gender bias in letters of recommendations written for urology residency applicants.
        Urology. 2019; 134: 56-61
        • Grimm L.J.
        • Redmond R.A.
        • Campbell J.C.
        • Rosette A.S.
        Gender and racial bias in radiology residency letters of recommendation.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17: 64-71
        • Turrentine F.E.
        • Dreisbach C.N.
        • St Ivany A.R.
        • Hanks J.B.
        • Schroen A.T.
        Influence of gender on surgical residency applicants’ recommendation letters.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2019; 228: 356-365.e3
        • Trix F.
        • Psenka C.
        Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty.
        Discourse Soc. 2003; 14: 191-220
        • Fiske S.T.
        • Cuddy A.J.C.
        • Glick P.
        • Xu J.
        A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 82: 878-902
        • Rosette A.S.
        • Koval C.Z.
        • Ma A.
        • Livingston R.
        Race matters for women leaders: intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties.
        Leadersh Q. 2016; 27: 429-445
        • Schein V.E.
        The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics.
        J Appl Psychol. 1973; 57: 95-100
        • Eagly A.H.
        • Karau S.J.
        Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
        Psychol Rev. 2002; 109: 573-598
        • Brotherton S.E.
        • Etzel S.I.
        Graduate medical education, 2018–2019.
        JAMA. 2019; 322: 996-1016
        • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
        ACGME Common Program Requirements (Residency).
        ACGME, Chicago, IL2020
        • Rosette A.S.
        • Leonardelli G.J.
        • Phillips K.W.
        The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization.
        J Appl Psychol. 2008; 93: 758-777
        • Katz D.
        • Braly K.
        Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students.
        J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1933; 28: 280-290
        • Niemann Y.F.
        • Jennings L.
        • Rozelle R.M.
        • Baxter J.C.
        • Sullivan E.
        Use of free responses and cluster analysis to determine stereotypes of eight groups.
        Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1994; 20: 379-390
        • Ghavami N.
        • Peplau L.A.
        An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: testing three hypotheses.
        Psychol Women Q. 2013; 37: 113-127
        • Madera J.M.
        • Hebl M.R.
        • Martin R.C.
        Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: agentic and communal differences.
        J Appl Psychol. 2009; 94: 1591-1599
        • Tausczik Y.R.
        • Pennebaker J.W.
        The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods.
        J Lang Soc Psychol. 2010; 29: 24-54
        • Staffa S.J.
        • Zurakowski D.
        Statistical power and sample size calculations: a primer for pediatric surgeons.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2020; 55: 1173-1179
        • Greenburg A.G.
        • Doyle J.
        • McClure D.K.
        Letters of recommendation for surgical residencies: what they say and what they mean.
        J Surg Res. 1994; 56: 192-198
        • Judge T.A.
        • Higgins C.A.
        Affective disposition and the letter of reference.
        Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998; 75: 207-221
        • Nicklin J.M.
        • Roch S.G.
        Biases influencing recommendation letter contents: physical attractiveness and gender1.
        J Appl Soc Psychol. 2008; 38: 3053-3074
        • Corcimaru A.
        • Morrell M.C.
        • Morrell D.S.
        Do looks matter? The role of the electronic residency application service photograph in dermatology residency selection.
        Dermatol Online J. 2018; 24: 13030
        • Kobayashi A.N.
        • Sterling R.S.
        • Tackett S.A.
        • Chee B.W.
        • Laporte D.M.
        • Humbyrd C.J.
        Are there gender-based differences in language in letters of recommendation to an orthopaedic surgery residency program?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020; 478: 1400-1408
        • Keshinro A.
        • Frangos S.
        • Berman R.S.
        • et al.
        Underrepresented minorities in surgical residencies: Where are They? A Call to Action to Increase the Pipeline.
        Ann Surg. 2020; 272: 512-520