Advertisement
Editor's Choice| Volume 45, ISSUE 6, P512-517, June 2020

Evaluation of the Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal and Cubital Tunnel Syndrome—A Prospective, Blinded Study

Published:April 13, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.02.016

      Purpose

      To clarify the sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability of the scratch collapse test for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cubital tunnel syndrome, using blinded observers in a general patient population.

      Methods

      Ninety-two subjects were recruited from all patients referred for electrodiagnostic studies for upper extremity symptoms that were thought to be related to an entrapment mononeuropathy. The scratch collapse test was performed twice on each patient, once by the resident and once by a nerve conduction technician. Both observers were blinded to all aspects of the patient’s presentation. Sensitivity and specificity for the scratch collapse test were calculated twice, once using electrodiagnostic testing results and a second time using a validated clinical tool (the CTS-6) as the reference standard. The interrater reliability was also calculated.

      Results

      Using electrodiagnostic criteria as a reference standard, the scratch collapse test had a sensitivity of 7% and a specificity of 78% for CTS. Using clinical criteria as a reference standard, the test had a sensitivity of 15% and a specificity of 87%. For cubital tunnel syndrome, the sensitivity was 10% and the specificity was 90%. For the resident/technician 1, kappa was –0.025 (worse than chance alone). For the resident/technician 2, kappa was 0.211 (fair strength of agreement).

      Conclusions

      The sensitivity of the scratch collapse test for CTS and cubital tunnel syndrome was lower than that found in other studies, regardless of whether a clinical or an electrodiagnostic reference standard was used. The specificity was high. Overall interrater agreement was lower than previously reported. These results call into question the sensitivity and interrater reliability of the scratch collapse test for CTS and cubital tunnel syndrome.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Diagnostic II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cheng C.J.
        • Mackinnon-Patterson B.
        • Beck J.L.
        • Mackinnon S.E.
        Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 1518-1524
        • Sheen K.
        • Chung J.M.
        Signs of neuropathic pain depend on signals from injured nerve fibers in a rat model.
        Brain Res. 1993; 610: 62-68
        • Uncini A.
        • Kujirai T.
        • Gluck B.
        • Pullman S.
        Silent period induced by cutaneous stimulation.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991; 81: 344-352
        • Gillenwater J.
        • Cheng J.
        • Mackinnon S.E.
        Evaluation of the scratch collapse test in peroneal nerve compression.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 933-999
        • Makanji H.S.
        • Becker S.J.
        • Mudgal C.S.
        • Jupiter J.B.
        • Ring D.
        Evaluation of the scratch collapse test for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014; 39: 181-186
        • Blok R.D.
        • Becker S.J.E.
        • Ring D.C.
        Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: interobserver reliability of the blinded scratch-collapse test.
        J Hand Microsurg. 2014; 6: 5-7
        • Simon J.
        • Lutsky K.
        • Maltenfort M.
        • Beredjiklian P.K.
        The accuracy of the scratch collapse test performed by blinded examiners on patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome assessed by electrodiagnostic studies.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42: 386.e1-386.e5
        • Boyer K.
        • Wies J.
        • Turkelson C.M.
        Effects of bias on the results of diagnostic studies of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 1006-1013
        • Graham B.
        • Regehr G.
        • Naglie G.
        • Wright J.G.
        Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31: 919-924
        • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines
        Diagnosis and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
        (Available at:)
        • Graham B.
        The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 2587-2593
        • Werner R.A.
        • Andary M.
        Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Muscle Nerve. 2011; 44: 597-607
        • American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine
        Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement.
        Muscle Nerve. 2002; 25: 918-922
        • American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine
        Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: summary statement.
        Muscle Nerve. 1999; 22: 408-411
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Cipolli W.
        • Hanson T.
        A comparison of three diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1958-1961
        • Kahn L.C.
        • Yee A.
        • Mackinnon S.E.
        Important details in performing and interpreting the scratch collapse test.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 399-407