Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the intraosseous vascular anatomy of
the scaphoid using recent advances in micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging
and 3-dimensional reconstruction. We also studied the effect of scaphoid shape and
screw position on the intraosseous vascular structure.
Methods
Thirteen upper extremities were injected with a contrast agent. The scaphoid bones
were extracted and scanned using a micro-CT scanner. The vascular impact of screw
insertion at various axes through the scaphoid was calculated and compared using the
generated 3-dimensional models. The specimens were 3-dimensionally–printed and the
morphology was assessed according to bone dimensions. A relationship between the internal
vascular patterns and these morphological features was determined.
Results
All specimens received vascular inflow from the dorsal ridge forming a vascular network
that supplied an average of 83% of the bone’s volume. This network was supplemented
in 4 specimens with volar vessels entering at the waist. Another network was identified,
created by vessels entering volarly at the tubercle, which supplied the remainder
of the scaphoid. One specimen did not receive any vessels at the tubercle. With regards
to screw placement, screws placed in the central axis were the least disruptive to
the internal vascularity, followed by the antegrade (dorsal) insertion axis. Two morphological
bone types were identified: type I or full scaphoids and type II or slender scaphoids.
Type I possessed a more robust internal vascular network than type II scaphoids.
Conclusions
This study identifies 2 distinct types of scaphoid morphology with 1 of them having
a less robust blood supply, which may prove to be related to development of nonunion,
avascular necrosis, or Preiser disease. Central axis and antegrade (dorsal) screw
fixation may be least disruptive to the internal blood supply.
Clinical relevance
Safer fixation of the scaphoid bone may be achieved by knowledge of intraosseous vascular
patterns.
Key words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Hand SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Bergen, Norway.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999; 33: 423-426
- The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981; 63-B: 225-230
- The vascularity of the scaphoid bone.J Hand Surg Am. 1980; 5: 508-513
- Fractures and non-unions of the carpal scaphoid.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71: 1560-1565
- The anatomy of the scaphoid.Hand Clin. 2001; 17: 525-532
- Osseous and ligamentous scaphoid anatomy: part I. A systematic literature review highlighting controversies.J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 1926-1935
- The morphological and morphometric features of the scaphoid.J Hand Surg Br. 2004; 29: 393-398
- The radiological anatomy of the scaphoid. Part 1: osteology.J Hand Surg Br. 1994; 19: 183-187
- Anthropometry of the human scaphoid.J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32: 1005-1008
- Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 149: 90-97
- Patterns of union in fractures of the waist of the scaphoid.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989; 71: 307-310
- Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984; 66: 114-123
- Stabilization of the fractured scaphoid under arthroscopic control.Orthop Clin North Am. 1995; 26: 749-754
- A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the differences between nonsurgical management and percutaneous fixation of minimally and nondisplaced scaphoid fractures.J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 1135-1144.e1
- Outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures.Hand (N Y). 2015; 10: 227-232
- A three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study of the intraosseous lunate vasculature: implications for surgical intervention and the development of avascular necrosis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 869e-878e
- Internal vascularity of the scaphoid in cadavers after insertion of the Herbert screw.J Hand Surg Am. 1988; 13: 216-220
- The vascular anatomy of the capitate: new discoveries using micro-computed tomography imaging.J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42: 78-86
- Comparison of two percutaneous volar approaches for screw fixation of scaphoid waist fractures: radiographic and biomechanical study of an osteotomy-simulated model.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1369-1376
- Herbert screw fixation by limited access for acute fractures of the scaphoid.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79: 418-421
- Arthroscopic reduction and percutaneous fixation of scaphoid fractures with a novel dorsal technique.Orthop Clin North Am. 2001; 32: 247-261
- The radiological anatomy of the scaphoid. Part 2: radiology.J Hand Surg Br. 1997; 22: 8-15
- The blood supply of the scaphoid bone.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009; 34: 351-357
- Scapholunate axis method.J Wrist Surg. 2016; 5: 59-66
- Statistical descriptions of scaphoid and lunate bone shapes.J Biomech. 2010; 43: 1463-1469
- Association between lunate morphology and carpal collapse in cases of scapholunate dissociation.J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 1633-1639
- Variations of capitate morphology in the wrist.J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 660-666
Article info
Publication history
Published online: September 19, 2019
Accepted:
August 2,
2019
Received:
November 17,
2018
Footnotes
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Journal CME QuestionsJournal of Hand SurgeryVol. 44Issue 11