Advertisement

An In-Depth Review of Physician Reimbursement for Digit and Thumb Replantation

Published:April 17, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.019

      Purpose

      To examine physician and hospital reimbursement for digit and thumb replantation compared with revision amputation.

      Methods

      Using the 2009–2016 Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases, we identified patients with a digit or thumb amputation. Following application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we divided patients into replantation and revision amputation groups. We extracted the mean physician and hospital reimbursement associated with each patient encounter. For comparison, we examined the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) and Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for the respective procedures in addition to several common hand surgery procedures.

      Results

      We identified 51,716 patients. Following application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 219 replantation and 6,209 revision amputation patients were included in our analysis. For replantation, the mean physician and hospital reimbursements ranged from $3,938 to $7,753 and $30,683 to $56,256, respectively. For revision amputation, the mean physician and hospital reimbursements ranged from $1,030 to $1,206 and $2,877 to $4,188, respectively. On multivariable analysis, hospitals performing replantation earned $37,788 more per case compared with revision amputation. Using the wRVU and MPFS data, we determined that replantation reimburses at $78/wRVU compared with higher earnings for revision amputation ($108), carpal tunnel release ($101), cubital tunnel release ($97), trigger finger release ($116), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) distal radius fracture ($87), flexor tendon repair ($98), extensor tendon repair ($122), repair of digital nerve ($89), and ORIF articular fracture ($82), respectively.

      Conclusions

      Low physician reimbursement for replantation compared with less complex hand procedures makes it difficult to recruit and retain hand surgeons for this purpose. By understanding the wRVU and MPFS system, hand surgeons and professional societies can explore ways to promote change in the way replantation is valued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as well as by hospital administrators.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Economic/Decision Analysis III.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hustedt J.W.
        • Bohl D.D.
        • Champagne L.
        The detrimental effect of decentralization in digital replantation in the United States: 15 years of evidence from the National Inpatient Sample.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 593-601
        • Sabapathy S.R.
        • Venkatramani H.V.
        • Bharathi R.R.
        • Bhardwaj P.
        Replantation surgery.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 1104-1110
        • Maroukis B.L.
        • Chung K.C.
        • MacEachern M.
        • Mahmoudi E.
        Hand trauma care in the United States: a literature review.
        Plast Recontr Surg. 2016; 137: 100e-111e
        • Shale C.M.
        • Tidwell III, J.E.
        • Mulligan R.P.
        • Jupiter D.C.
        • Mahabir R.
        A nationwide review of the treatment patterns of traumatic thumb amputations.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 70: 647-651
        • Friedrich J.B.
        • Poppler L.H.
        • Mack C.D.
        • Rivara F.P.
        • Levin L.S.
        • Klein M.B.
        Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 1835-1840
        • Mahmoudi E.
        • Huetteman H.E.
        • Chung K.C.
        A population-based study of replantation after traumatic thumb amputation, 2007–2012.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42: 25-33
        • Chung K.C.
        • Kowalski C.P.
        • Walters M.R.
        Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from 1996 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2000; 25: 1038-1042
        • Chung K.C.
        • Alderman A.K.
        Replantation of the upper extremity: indications and outcomes.
        J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2002; 2: 78-94
        • Hustedt J.W.
        • Chung A.
        • Bohl D.D.
        • Olmschied N.
        • Edwards S.
        Evaluating the effect of comorbidities on the success, risk and cost of digital replantation.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 1145-1152
        • Payatakes A.H.
        • Zagoreos N.P.
        • Fedorcik G.G.
        • Ruch D.S.
        • Levin L.S.
        Current practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for the Surgery of the Hand.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32: 541-547
        • Allen D.M.
        • Levin L.S.
        Digital replantation including postoperative care.
        Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2002; 6: 171-177
        • Ejaz A.
        • Gani F.
        • Kim Y.
        • Pawlik T.M.
        Variation in inpatient hospital and physician payments among patients undergoing general versus orthopedic operations.
        Surgery. 2016; 160: 1657-1665
        • Peterson J.
        • Sodhi N.
        • Khlopas A.
        • et al.
        A comparison of relative value units in primary versus revision total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33: S39-S42
        • Veltre D.R.
        • Yakavonis M.
        • Curry E.J.
        • et al.
        Regional variations of Medicare physician payments for hand surgery procedures in the United States.
        Hand (N Y). 2019; 14: 209-216
        • Higgins J.P.
        The diminishing presence of plastic surgeons in hand surgery: a critical analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 248-260
        • Chung K.C.
        • Lau F.H.
        • Kotsis S.V.
        • Kim H.M.
        Factors influencing residents’ decisions to pursue a career in hand surgery: a national survey.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2004; 29: 738-747
        • Baadh A.
        • Peterkin Y.
        • Wegener M.
        • Flug J.
        • Katz D.
        • Hoffman J.C.
        Relative value unit: history, current use and controversies.
        Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016; 45: 128-132
        • Elixhauser A.
        • Steiner C.
        • Harris D.R.
        • Coffey R.M.
        Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
        Med Care. 1998; 36: 8-27
        • van Walraven C.
        • Austin P.C.
        • Jennings A.
        • Quan H.
        • Forster A.J.
        A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.
        Med Care. 2009; 47: 626-633
        • Sheckter C.C.
        • Yi D.
        • Panchal H.J.
        • et al.
        Trends in physician payment for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 493e-499e
        • Momeni A.
        • Kattan A.
        • Lee G.K.
        Is microsurgical head and neck reconstruction profitable? Analysis at an academic medical center.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 68: 401-403
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Physician Fee Schedule.
        (Available at:)
      1. Guidelines for trauma care systems. American College of Emergency Physicians.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 1079-1100
        • American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Prehospital Trauma Care
        Resources for the optimal care of the injured patient: 1999.
        American College of Surgeons, Chicago1998: 13-17
        • Peterson B.C.
        • Mangiapani D.
        • Kellogg R.
        • Leversedge F.J.
        Hand and microvascular replantation call availability study: a national real-time survey of level-I and level-II trauma centers.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: e185
        • Mueller M.A.
        • Zaydfudim V.
        • Sexton K.W.
        • Shack R.B.
        • Thayer W.P.
        Lack of emergency hand surgery: discrepancy between elective and emergency hand care.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 68: 513-517
        • Chen M.W.
        • Narayan D.
        Economics of upper extremity replantation: national and local trends.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 2003-2011
        • Aiello F.
        • Durgin J.
        • Daniel V.
        • et al.
        Surgeon leadership in the coding, billing, and contractual negotiations for fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair increased medical center contribution margin and physician reimbursement.
        J Vasc Surg. 2017; 66: 997-1066
        • Brown M.
        • Lu Y.
        • Chung K.C.
        • Mahmoudi E.
        Annual hospital volume and success of digit replantation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 672-680