Advertisement

A Prospective Evaluation of Early Postoperative Complications After Distal Biceps Tendon Repairs

Published:November 13, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.009

      Purpose

      The reported incidence of postoperative complications after distal biceps tendon repairs (DBTRs) has been determined largely by retrospective studies. We hypothesized that a large prospective cohort study of DBTRs would demonstrate increased complication rates relative to existing literature values. Secondarily, we hypothesized that most complications would be transient and self-limiting, regardless of the surgical technique employed for the repair.

      Methods

      Consecutive patients undergoing acute, primary DBTR from July 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled. The repair technique, postoperative protocol, and follow-up intervals were determined by the individual surgeons’ protocols. Demographic information, surgical data, and complications were tabulated prospectively. Exclusion criteria included chronic DBTRs, secondary DBTRs requiring allograft, DBTRs of partial tears, and postoperative follow-up of less than 12 weeks. We included 212 repairs performed by 37 orthopedic surgeons in 3 different subspecialties.

      Results

      Sixty-five patients (30.7%) had 73 complications. Fifty patients (44.6%) in the 1-incision group experienced complications compared with 15 (15.0%) in the 2-incision group. Sixty patients (28.3%) developed a minor complication. Fifty-seven patients (26.9%) had sensory neurapraxias, 47 after a 1-incision procedure and 10 after a 2-incision procedure, a statistically significant difference. Of the patients with neurapraxias, 94.7% were resolved or improving at the time of the latest follow-up. Five patients (2.4%) developed a major complication, defined as a return to the operating room in the postoperative period due to deep infection or rerupture.

      Conclusions

      The complication rate after DBTR appears to be higher than 2 other retrospective studies and is predominantly in the form of transient neurapraxias. This study confirms that there is a higher complication rate in 1-incision techniques as compared with 2-incision techniques.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Therapeutic II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kelly M.P.
        • Perkinson S.G.
        • Ablove R.H.
        • Tueting J.L.
        Distal biceps tendon ruptures: an epidemiological analysis using a large population database.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 2012-2017
        • Safran M.R.
        • Graham S.M.
        Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking.
        Clin Orthop. 2002; : 275-283
        • Hetsroni I.
        • Pilz-Burstein R.
        • Nyska M.
        • Back Z.
        • Barchilon V.
        • Mann G.
        Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon in middle-aged population: is surgical repair advisable?.
        Injury. 2008; 39: 753-760
        • Baker B.E.
        • Bierwagen D.
        Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. Operative versus non-operative treatment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67: 414-417
        • Meherin J.M.
        • Kilgore E.S.
        The treatment of ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon.
        Am J Surg. 1960; 99: 636-640
        • Friedmann E.
        Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: report on 13 cases.
        JAMA. 1963; 184: 60-63
        • Karunakar M.A.
        • Cha P.
        • Stern P.J.
        Distal biceps ruptures. A followup of Boyd and Anderson repair.
        Clin Orthop. 1999; : 100-107
        • Bain G.I.
        • Prem H.
        • Heptinstall R.J.
        • Verhellen R.
        • Paix D.
        Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture: A new technique using the endobutton.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9: 120-126
        • Balabaud L.
        • Ruiz C.
        • Nonnenmacher J.
        • Seynaeve P.
        • Kehr P.
        • Rapp E.
        Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a suture anchor and an anterior approach.
        J Hand Surg. 2004; 29: 178-182
        • Cusick M.C.
        • Cottrell B.J.
        • Cain R.A.
        • Mighell M.A.
        Low incidence of tendon rerupture after distal biceps repair by cortical button and interference screw.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 1532-1536
        • Khan A.D.
        • Penna S.
        • Yin Q.
        • Sinopidis C.
        • Brownson P.
        • Frostick S.P.
        Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using suture anchors through a single anterior incision.
        Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2008; 24: 39-45
        • Savin D.D.
        • Watson J.
        • Youderian A.R.
        • et al.
        Surgical management of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 785-796
        • Sethi P.
        • Obopilwe E.
        • Rincon L.
        • Miller S.
        • Mazzocca A.
        Biomechanical evaluation of distal biceps reconstruction with cortical button and interference screw fixation.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 53-57
        • Garon M.T.
        • Greenberg J.A.
        Complications of distal biceps repair.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2016; 47: 435-444
        • Dunphy T.R.
        • Hudson J.
        • Batech M.
        • Acevedo D.C.
        • Mirzayan R.
        Surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures: an analysis of complications in 784 surgical repairs.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 3020-3029
        • Waterman B.R.
        • Navarro-Figueroa L.
        • Owens B.D.
        Primary repair of traumatic distal biceps ruptures in a military population: clinical outcomes of single- versus 2-incision technique.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1672-1678
        • Watson J.N.
        • Moretti V.M.
        • Schwindel L.
        • Hutchinson M.R.
        Repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014; 96: 2086-2090
        • Amin N.H.
        • Volpi A.
        • Lynch T.S.
        • et al.
        Complications of distal biceps tendon repair: a meta-analysis of single-incision versus double-incision surgical technique.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4 (2325967116668137)
        • Citak M.
        • Backhaus M.
        • Seybold D.
        • Suero E.M.
        • Schildhauer T.A.
        • Roetman B.
        Surgical repair of the distal biceps brachii tendon: a comparative study of three surgical fixation techniques.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 1936-1941
        • Silva J.
        • Eskander M.S.
        • Lareau C.
        • DeAngelis N.A.
        Treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single-incision technique and a Bio-Tenodesis screw.
        Orthopedics. 2010; 33: 477
        • Eardley W.G.
        • Odak S.
        • Adesina T.S.
        • Jeavons R.P.
        • McVie J.L.
        Bioabsorbable interference screw fixation of distal biceps ruptures through a single anterior incision: a single-surgeon case series and review of the literature.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130: 875-881
        • Grewal R.
        • Athwal G.S.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • et al.
        Single versus double-incision technique for the repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 1166-1174