Advertisement

Variability of PROMIS Scores Across Hand Conditions

Published:December 18, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.029

      Purpose

      This study aimed to determine whether Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference scores varied at presentation for specialty care by nontrauma hand condition. The secondary aim was to compare PROMIS scores with a reference standard, the Quick–Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), regarding the magnitude and direction of score differentials among diagnoses.

      Methods

      PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores were analyzed from 1,471 consecutive new adult patient clinic visits at a tertiary orthopedic hand clinic presenting with 1 of 5 nontrauma hand conditions. A 5-point difference on PROMIS assessments was presumed to be clinically relevant. A random sample of 30 QuickDASH scores from each diagnostic group was evaluated for score differentials among groups. We also measured the correlation between PROMIS and QuickDASH scores.

      Results

      Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and thumb basal joint arthritis reported worse physical function and more pain interference, whereas those with Dupuytren contractures and ganglion cysts reported less pain and better function. For both domains, patients with trigger fingers averaged PROMIS scores among the other groups. Similar differences were observed in QuickDASH scores because patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and thumb arthritis reported clinically worse upper-extremity function than did patients with ganglion cysts and Dupuytren contracture. A strong correlation was seen between QuickDASH scores with both PROMIS Physical Function scores and Pain Interference scores.

      Conclusions

      The PROMIS system is sufficiently able to capture differences in self-reported function and pain interference among patients with different hand conditions. Moreover, PROMIS Physical Function demonstrates construct validity when evaluated against a reference of the QuickDASH across nontrauma hand conditions.

      Clinical relevance

      The use of PROMIS is expanding, but because PROMIS is not disease-specific, assessment of its construct validity is necessary for hand conditions.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cella D.
        • Yount S.
        • Rothrock N.
        • et al.
        The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: S3-S11
        • Rineberg B.A.
        A call to leadership: the role of orthopaedic surgeons in musculoskeletal outcomes research.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 1439-1440
        • Deshpande P.R.
        • Rajan S.
        • Sudeepthi B.L.
        • Abdul Nazir C.P.
        Patient-reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research.
        Perspect Clin Res. 2011; 2: 137-144
        • Fries J.F.
        • Witter J.
        • Rose M.
        • Cella D.
        • Khanna D.
        • Morgan-DeWitt E.
        Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function.
        J Rheumatol. 2014; 41: 153-158
        • Hung M.
        • Franklin J.D.
        • Hon S.D.
        • Cheng C.
        • Conrad J.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 1-7
        • Cella D.
        • Riley W.
        • Stone A.
        • et al.
        The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 1179-1194
        • Broderick J.E.
        • Schneider S.
        • Junghaenel D.U.
        • Schwartz J.E.
        • Stone A.A.
        Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis.
        Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013; 65: 1625-1633
        • Cella D.
        • Gershon R.
        • Lai J.-S.
        • Choi S.
        The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment.
        Qual Life Res. 2007; 16: 133-141
        • Bartlett S.J.
        • Orbai A.M.
        • Duncan T.
        • et al.
        Reliability and validity of selected PROMIS measures in people with rheumatoid arthritis.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0138543
        • Flynn K.E.
        • Dew M.A.
        • Lin L.
        • et al.
        Reliability and construct validity of PROMIS measures for patients with heart failure who undergo heart transplant.
        Qual Life Res. 2015; 24: 2591-2599
        • Howell C.R.
        • Gross H.E.
        • Reeve B.B.
        • DeWalt D.A.
        • Huang I.C.
        Known-groups validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in adolescents and young adults with special healthcare needs.
        Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 1815-1823
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Silverstein M.D.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        • Schleck C.D.
        • Jensen L.M.
        Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21: 338-346
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Richards R.S.
        • Donner A.
        • Bellamy N.
        • Roth J.H.
        Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2000; 25: 330-340
        • Gay R.E.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Johnson J.C.
        Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28: 250-254
        • Brodke D.
        • Saltzman C.
        • Brodke D.
        PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24: 744-749
        • Beckmann J.T.
        • Hung M.
        • Voss M.W.
        • Crum A.B.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Tyser A.R.
        Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 739-744.e734
        • Döring A.C.
        • Nota S.P.
        • Hageman M.G.
        • Ring D.C.
        Measurement of upper extremity disability using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 1160-1165
        • Overbeek C.L.
        • Nota S.P.
        • Jayakumar P.
        • Hageman M.G.
        • Ring D.
        The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 311-317
        • Tyser A.R.
        • Beckmann J.
        • Franklin J.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 2047-2051.e2044
        • Fries J.
        • Krishnan E.
        • Rose M.
        • Lingala B.
        • Bruce B.
        Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory.
        Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13: R147
        • Morgan J.H.
        • Kallen M.A.
        • Okike K.
        • Lee O.C.
        • Vrahas M.S.
        PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test compared with other upper extremity outcome measures in the evaluation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: 257-263
        • Beckmann J.T.
        • Hung M.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Wylie J.D.
        • Granger E.K.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1961-1967
        • Senders A.
        • Hanes D.
        • Bourdette D.
        • Whitham R.
        • Shinto L.
        Reducing survey burden: feasibility and validity of PROMIS measures in multiple sclerosis.
        Mult Scler. 2014; 20: 1102-1111
        • Amtmann D.
        • Cook K.F.
        • Jensen M.P.
        • et al.
        Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference.
        Pain. 2010; 150: 173-182
        • Amtmann D.
        • Kim J.
        • Chung H.
        • Askew R.L.
        • Park R.
        • Cook K.F.
        Minimally important differences for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference for individuals with back pain.
        J Pain Res. 2016; 9: 251-255
        • Yost K.J.
        • Eton D.T.
        • Garcia S.F.
        • Cella D.
        Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 507-516
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Wright J.G.
        • Katz J.N.
        • Group U.E.C.
        Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1038-1046
        • Sorensen A.A.
        • Howard D.
        • Tan W.H.
        • Ketchersid J.
        • Calfee R.P.
        Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38: 641-649
        • Evans J.D.
        Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
        Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA1996
        • Van Vliet M.M.
        • Maradey J.A.
        • Homa K.A.
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        The usefulness of patient-reported measures for clinical practice.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 105-112
        • Hung M.
        • Voss M.W.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Crum A.B.
        • Tyser A.R.
        Examination of the PROMIS upper extremity item bank.
        J Hand Ther. 2017; 30: 485-490
        • Anthony C.A.
        • Glass N.A.
        • Hancock K.
        • Bollier M.
        • Wolf B.R.
        • Hettrich C.M.
        Performance of PROMIS instruments in patients with shoulder instability.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 449-453
        • Beleckas C.M.
        • Padovano A.
        • Guattery J.
        • Chamberlain A.M.
        • Keener J.D.
        • Calfee R.P.
        Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) versus Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs) in upper extremity clinics.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42: 867-874