The Use of Preoperative Dynamic Ultrasound to Predict Ulnar Nerve Stability Following In Situ Decompression for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Published:November 27, 2018DOI:


      To assess the use of preoperative, dynamic ultrasound to predict ulnar nerve instability following in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome.


      Prior to undergoing in situ decompression, 43 consecutive patients underwent dynamic ultrasound to assess the stability of the ulnar nerve during elbow flexion. The dynamic ultrasound findings were compared with the intraoperative assessment of nerve stability following in situ decompression.


      The preoperative dynamic ultrasound agreed with intraoperative findings in 38 of 43 patients (88%). Physical examination of ulnar nerve stability agreed with the intraoperative findings in 5 of 43 patients (12%). For the 5 of 43 cases in which the dynamic ultrasound did not correlate with the degree of ulnar nerve stability after in situ decompression, dynamic ultrasound overestimated the degree of ulnar nerve stability in 4 cases.


      Preoperative dynamic ultrasound can be used to accurately predict the degree of ulnar nerve instability following in situ decompression.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Diagnostic II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Hoffmann R.
        • Siemionow M.
        The endoscopic management of cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2006; 31: 23-29
        • Bozentka D.J.
        Cubital tunnel syndrome pathophysiology.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; : 90-94
        • Bartels R.H.
        • Verhagen W.I.
        • van der Wilt G.J.
        • Meulstee J.
        • van Rossum L.G.
        • Grotenhuis J.A.
        Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.
        Neurosurgery. 2005; (1;56(3):522–530)
        • Nabhan A.
        • Ahlhelm F.
        • Kelm J.
        • Reith W.
        • Schwerdtfeger K.
        • Steudel W.I.
        Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2005; 30: 521-524
        • Gervasio O.
        • Gambardella G.
        • Zaccone C.
        • Branca D.
        Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study.
        Neurosurgery. 2005; 56: 108-117
        • Matzon J.L.
        • Lutsky K.F.
        • Hoffler C.E.
        • Kim N.
        • Maltenfort M.
        • Beredjiklian P.K.
        Risk factors for ulnar nerve instability resulting in transposition in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 21: 180-183
        • Calfee R.P.
        • Manske P.R.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Van Steyn M.O.
        • Steffen J.
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        Clinical assessment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: reliability of instability testing and the association of hypermobility with clinical symptoms.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 2801-2808
        • Babusiaux D.
        • Laulan J.
        • Bouilleau L.
        • et al.
        Contribution of static and dynamic ultrasound in cubital tunnel syndrome.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100: 209-212
        • Okamoto M.
        • Abe M.
        • Shirai H.
        • Ueda N.
        Morphology and dynamics of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. Observation by ultrasonography.
        J Hand Surg Br. 2000; 25: 85-89
        • Palmer B.A.
        • Hughes T.B.
        Cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35: 153-163
        • Macadam S.A.
        • Gandhi R.
        • Bezuhly M.
        • Lefaivre K.A.
        Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33 (1314.e1–e12)
        • Zlowodzki M.
        • Chan S.
        • Bhandari M.
        • Kalliainen L.
        • Schubert W.
        Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 2591-2598
        • Staples R.
        • London D.A.
        • Dardas A.Z.
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        • Calfee R.P.
        Comparative morbidity of cubital tunnel surgeries: a prospective cohort study.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 43: 207-213
        • Chiou H.J.
        • Chou Y.H.
        • Cheng S.P.
        • et al.
        Cubital tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by high-resolution ultrasonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1998; 17: 643-648
        • Park G.Y.
        • Kim J.M.
        • Lee S.M.
        The ultrasonographic and electrodiagnostic findings of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1000-1005
        • Beekman R.
        • Schoemaker M.C.
        • Van Der Plas J.P.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic value of high-resolution sonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
        Neurology. 2004; 62: 767-773
        • Wiesler E.R.
        • Chloros G.D.
        • Cartwright M.S.
        • Shin H.W.
        • Walker F.O.
        Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31: 1088-1093