Advertisement

Comparison of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and PROMIS Instruments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Published:December 21, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.031

      Purpose

      Patient-reported outcomes are important to assess improvement after surgery. Common instruments for carpal tunnel syndrome include the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (CTQ). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) are newer measures. We evaluated how the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) and Upper Extremity (UE) scores change after carpal tunnel release.

      Methods

      All adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome treated surgically were asked to participate in this prospective study. PROMIS instruments, MHQ, and CTQ were completed by 101 patients. Estimated means and standard errors were calculated, and piecewise linear fixed effects regression models were applied to the data. Standardized response means were calculated for each outcome measure.

      Results

      The MHQ Total Score did not show a considerable change from the preoperative to 1-week postoperative visit but improved from the 1-week to 3-month postoperative visit (55 to 80). The CTQ Functional Status Score (FSS) worsened from 2.3 preoperatively to 2.6 at the 1-week postoperative visit before improving through the 3-month postoperative visit (1.6). PROMIS UE showed responsiveness similar to the CTQ FSS with a decline at the 1-week visit, 38 to 33, followed by improvement (45 at 3 mo). However, the standardized response mean values were greater for the CTQ FSS compared with PROMIS UE. The average administration time was shortest for PROMIS UE. The CTQ Symptom Severity Scale and MHQ Pain Scores showed improvements as early as the 1-week visit. The CTQ Symptom Severity Scale improved from 3.1 to 2.3, and MHQ Pain Scores improved from 55 to 46. PROMIS PI did not change at the 1-week visit but improved at 6 weeks and 3 months, from 56 to 52 and 49. The standardized response means for PROMIS PI achieved a large effect size only at 3 months.

      Conclusions

      The CTQ FSS is more responsive than PROMIS UE and the MHQ, with the CTQ FSS showing the largest effect sizes. PROMIS PI does not show the responsiveness seen in the CTQ Symptom Severity Scale and MHQ Pain Score. PROMIS instruments require less time to complete.

      Clinical relevance

      This study demonstrates the change in PROMIS scores after carpal tunnel release and how they compare with legacy outcome instruments.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hudak A.
        • Amadio P.
        • Bombardier C.
        Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand).
        Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 602-608
        • Chung K.
        • Hamill J.
        • Walters M.
        • Hayward R.
        The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 42: 619-622
        • Levine D.
        • Simmons B.
        • Koris M.
        A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1993; 75A: 1585-1592
        • MacDermid J.
        • Turgeon T.
        • Richards R.
        • Beadle M.
        • Roth J.
        Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool.
        J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12: 577-586
        • Ho B.
        • Houck J.R.
        • Flemister A.S.
        • et al.
        Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 911-918
      1. Bernstein DN, Houck JR, Gonzalez RM, et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative PROMIS score improvements for patients undergoing hand surgery [published online ahead of print August 3, 2018]. Hand (N Y). https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558944718791188.

        • Rubery P.T.
        • Houck J.
        • Mesfin A.
        • Molinari R.
        • Papuga M.
        Preoperative PROMIS scores assist in predicting early postoperative success in lumbar discectomy.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44: 325-333
        • Papuga M.O.
        • Beck C.A.
        • Kates S.L.
        • Schwarz E.M.
        • Maloney M.D.
        Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction.
        J Orthop Res. 2014; 32: 793-801
        • Graham B.
        • Peljovich A.
        • Afra R.
        • et al.
        The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline on: management of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2016; 98: 1750-1754
        • Chatterjee J.S.
        • Price P.E.
        Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 273-280
        • Leite J.C.D.C.
        • Jerosch-Herold C.
        • Song F.
        A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7: 78
        • Gay R.E.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Johnson J.C.
        Comparative responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28: 250-254
        • Horng Y.S.
        • Lin M.C.
        • Feng C.T.
        • Huang C.H.
        • Wu H.C.
        • Wang J Der
        Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in patients with hand injury.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35: 430-436
        • Döring A.C.
        • Nota S.P.
        • Hageman M.G.
        • Ring D.C.
        Measurement of upper extremity disability using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 1160-1165
        • Overbeek C.
        • Nota S.
        • Jayakumar P.
        • Hageman M.
        • Ring D.
        The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 311-317
        • Beleckas C.
        • Padovano A.
        • Guattery J.
        • Chamberlain A.
        • Keener J.
        • Calfee R.
        Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) versus physical function (PF) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in upper extremity clinics.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42: 867-874
        • Chung K.C.
        • Pillsbury M.S.
        • Walter M.R.
        • Hayward R.A.
        Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23: 575-587
        • Shi H.
        • Chiu H.
        • Chang J.
        • Wang J.
        • Culbertson R.
        • Khan M.
        Evaluation and prediction of health-related quality of life for total hip replacement among Chinese in Taiwan.
        Int Orthop. 2008; 32: 27-32
        • Beckmann J.
        • Hung M.
        • Voss M.
        • Crum A.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Tyser A.
        Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System upper extremity computer adaptive test.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 739-744