Advertisement
Editor's choice| Volume 42, ISSUE 12, P987-995, December 2017

Download started.

Ok

Patients Transferred for Upper Extremity Amputation: Participation of Regional Trauma Centers

Published:September 20, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.006

      Purpose

      Level-I trauma centers are required to provide hand and microsurgery capability at all times. We examined transfers to our center to better understand distant patient referrals and, indirectly, study referrals in our region.

      Methods

      Records were reviewed from 2010 to 2015 to evaluate patients transferred to our level-I institution for upper extremity amputation. Patients were referred from 6 states to our institution over this period. We measured the straight-line distance from each patient's transferring facility to our facility and compared this distance with the straight-line distances from the zip code of the transferring facility to the zip code of each level-I trauma center.

      Results

      We had data for 250 transferred patients (91% male, 9% female). For 110 patients (44%), our hospital was the nearest level-I trauma center; however, for the remaining 140 patients (56%), other level-I trauma facilities were located closer to the referring hospital. Among these 140 patients, the mean distance of the referring facility to the nearest level-I trauma center (30 miles; SD, 27) was significantly different from the mean distance of the referring facility to our facility (71 miles; SD, 60). A median of 4 (range, 1–10) level-I trauma centers were bypassed before patients arrived at our center. Medicaid and “self-pay” patients were more likely to be transferred to our facility.

      Conclusions

      Fifty-six percent of patients transferred to our hospital for upper extremity amputation had a level-I trauma center closer to their injury. Patients with upper extremity amputation are referred to our regional center despite the proximity of closer level-I trauma centers. This suggests that regional microsurgery expertise does not correlate with level-I trauma designation, and establishment of designated microsurgery centers and formal referral guidelines may be beneficial for management of these difficult injuries.

      Clinical relevance

      We believe that this study further supports the need for formal designation of regional centers of expertise for microsurgical hand trauma.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rudkin S.E.
        • Oman J.
        • Langdorf M.I.
        • et al.
        The state of ED on-call coverage in California.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2004; 22: 575-581
        • Menchine M.D.
        • Baraff L.J.
        On-call specialists and higher level of care transfers in California emergency departments.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 329-336
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
        Medicare Program; Clarifying Policies Related to the Responsibilities of Medicare-Participating Hospitals in Treating Individuals With Emergency Medical Conditions; Final Rule.
        Fed Regist. 2003; 68: 53222-53264
      1. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA). PL 99-272. Title IX, Section 9121, 100 Stat 167. Available at: http://www.legisworks.org/GPO/STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf. Published April 7, 1986. Accessed February 1, 2016.

        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Medicare program: clarifying policies related to the responsibilities of Medicare-participating hospitals in treating individuals with emergency medical conditions. Final rule.
        Fed Regist. 2003; 68: 53222-53264
        • Patterson J.M.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Ricci W.M.
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        Hand trauma: a prospective evaluation of patients transferred to a level I trauma center.
        Am J Orthop. 2010; 39: 196-200
        • Bauer A.S.
        • Blazar P.E.
        • Earp B.E.
        • Louie D.L.
        • Pallin D.J.
        Characteristics of emergency department transfers for hand surgery consultation.
        Hand (N Y). 2013; 8: 12-16
        • Kao D.P.
        • Martin M.H.
        • Das A.K.
        • Ruoss S.J.
        Consequences of federal patient transfer regulations: effect of the 2003 EMTALA revision on a tertiary referral center and evidence of possible misuse.
        Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172: 891-892
      2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2011 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2011_ed_web_tables.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2016.

        • Ootes D.
        • Lambers K.T.
        • Ring D.C.
        The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States.
        Hand (N Y). 2011; 7: 18-22
      3. ACS National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Available at: https://www.facs.org/search/trauma-centers?country=United%20States. Accessed February 3, 2016.

        • Niska R.
        • Bhuiya F.
        • Xu J.
        National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary.
        Natl Health Stat Rep. 2010; 26: 1-31
      4. Consultation/Verification Program Reference Guide of Suggested Classification. Available at: https://www.facs.org/∼/media/files/quality%20programs/trauma/vrc1.ashx. Accessed February 1, 2016.

        • Payatakes A.
        • Zagoreos N.
        • Fedorcik G.
        • Ruch D.
        • Levin L.
        Current practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32: 541-547
        • Eberlin K.R.
        • Hartzell T.L.
        • Kuo P.
        • Winograd J.
        • Day C.
        Patients transferred for emergency upper extremity evaluation: does insurance status matter?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 593-600
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        • Borrelli J.
        • Lu M.
        • Ricci W.M.
        A prospective evaluation of patients with isolated orthopedic injuries transferred to a level I trauma center.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20: 613-617
        • Archdeacon M.T.
        The influence of insurance status on the transfer of femoral fracture patients to a level-I trauma center.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 2625-2631
        • Nolte M.T.
        • Giladi A.M.
        • Shauver M.J.
        • Chung K.C.
        Effect of policy change on the use of long-distance transport and follow-up care for patients with traumatic finger amputations.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 610-617.e2
        • Maricevich M.
        • Carlsen B.
        • Mardini S.
        • Moran S.
        Upper extremity and digital replantation.
        Hand (N Y). 2011; 6: 356-363
        • Dec W.
        A Meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation.
        Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2006; 10: 124-129
        • Yu H.
        • Wei L.
        • Liang B.
        • Hou S.
        • Wang J.
        • Yang Y.
        Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate: a metaanalysis.
        Indian J Orthop. 2015; 49: 265-271
        • Grantham W.
        • To P.
        • Watson J.
        • Brywczynski J.
        • Lee D.
        Retrospective review of air transportation use for upper extremity amputations at a level-1 trauma center.
        J Hand Microsurg. 2016; 8: 86-90
        • Heistein J.B.
        • Cook P.A.
        Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 50: 299-303
        • Ovadia S.
        • Askari M.
        Upper extremity amputations and prosthetics.
        Semin Plast Surg. 2015; 29: 55-61
        • Bhattacharyya T.
        • Millham F.H.
        Relationship between weather and seasonal factors and trauma admission volume at a level Itrauma center.
        J Trauma. 2001; 51: 118-122
        • Rising W.R.
        • O'Daniel J.A.
        • Roberts C.S.
        Correlating weather and trauma admissions at a level I trauma center.
        J Trauma. 2006; 60: 1096-1100
        • Parsons N.
        • Odumenya M.
        • Edwards A.
        • Lecky F.
        • Pattison G.
        Modelling the effects of the weather on admissions to UK trauma units: a cross-sectional study.
        Emerg Med J. 2010; 28: 851-855
        • Atherton W.
        • Harper W.
        • Abrams K.
        A year’s trauma admissions and the effect of the weather.
        Injury. 2005; 36: 40-46
        • Selig H.F.
        • Nagele P.
        • Voelckel W.G.
        • et al.
        The epidemiology of amputation injuries in the Austrian helicopter emergency medical service: a retrospective, nationwide cohort study.
        Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012; 38: 651-657
        • Lindfors N.
        • Raatikainen T.
        Incidence, epidemiology, and operative outcome of replantation or revascularisation of injury to the upper extremity.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2010; 44: 44-49
        • Lindqvist A.
        • Gerdin B.
        Hand injury from powered wood splitters.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2008; 42: 246-252