Advertisement

Simple Assessment of Global Bone Density and Osteoporosis Screening Using Standard Radiographs of the Hand

Published:February 24, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.012

      Purpose

      Osteoporosis and fragility fractures have consequences both at the individual level and to the overall health care system. Although dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD), other, simpler tools may be able to screen bone quality provisionally and signal the need for intervention. We hypothesized that the second metacarpal cortical percentage (2MCP) calculated from standard radiographs of the hand or wrist would correlate with hip BMD derived from DXA and could provide a simple screening tool for osteoporosis.

      Methods

      Two hundred patients who had hand or wrist radiographs and hip DXA scans within 1 year of each other were included in this series. Mid-diaphyseal 2MCP was calculated as the ratio of the cortical diameter to the total diameter. We assessed the correlation between 2MCP and total hip BMD. Subjects were stratified into normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic cohorts based on hip t scores, and thresholds were identified to optimize screening sensitivity and specificity.

      Results

      Second metacarpal cortical percentage correlated significantly with BMD and t scores from the hip. A 2MCP threshold of less than 60% optimized sensitivity (88%) and specificity (60%) for discerning osteopenic subjects from normal subjects, whereas a threshold of less than 50% optimized sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%) for differentiating osteoporotic from normal subjects.

      Conclusions

      By demonstrating that global BMD may be assessed from 2MCP, these data suggest that radiographs of the hand and wrist may have a role in accurately screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis. This simple investigation, which is already used ubiquitously for patients with hand or wrist problems, may identify patients at risk for fragility fractures and allow for appropriate referral or treatment.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Diagnostic II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bunta A.D.
        It is time for everyone to own the bone.
        Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22: 477-482
        • Cauley J.A.
        Public health impact of osteoporosis.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68: 1243-1251
        • Blume S.W.
        • Curtis J.R.
        Medical costs of osteoporosis in the elderly Medicare population.
        Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22: 1835-1844
        • Rozental T.D.
        • Makhni E.C.
        • Day C.S.
        • Bouxsein M.L.
        Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radial fractures: a prospective randomized intervention.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 953-961
        • Freedman K.B.
        • Kaplan F.S.
        • Bilker W.B.
        • Strom B.L.
        • Lowe R.A.
        Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity?.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 1063-1070
        • Karpf D.B.
        • Shapiro D.R.
        • Seeman E.
        • et al.
        Prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate: a meta-analysis. Alendronate Osteoporosis Treatment Study Groups.
        JAMA. 1997; 277: 1159-1164
        • Harness N.G.
        • Funahashi T.
        • Dell R.
        • et al.
        Distal radius fracture risk reduction with a comprehensive osteoporosis management program.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37: 1543-1549
        • Marshall D.
        • Johnell O.
        • Wedel H.
        Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 1254-1259
        • Kanis J.A.
        Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.
        Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4: 368-381
      1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Osteoporosis: Screening. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/osteoporosis-screening. Accessed January 8, 2017.

        • Webber T.
        • Patel S.P.
        • Pensak M.
        • Fajolu O.
        • Rozental T.D.
        • Wolf J.M.
        Correlation between distal radial cortical thickness and bone mineral density.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40: 493-499
        • Riggs B.L.
        • Wahner H.W.
        • Dunn W.L.
        • Mazess R.B.
        • Offord K.P.
        • Melton III, L.J.
        Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.
        J Clin Invest. 1981; 67: 328-335
        • Barnett E.
        • Nordin B.E.
        The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.
        Clin Radiol. 1960; 11: 166-174
        • Lewiecki E.M.
        • Gordon C.M.
        • Baim S.
        • et al.
        International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions.
        Bone. 2008; 43: 1115-1121
        • Schreiber J.J.
        • Anderson P.A.
        • Rosas H.G.
        • Buchholz A.L.
        • Au A.G.
        Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 1057-1063
        • Pervaiz K.
        • Cabezas A.
        • Downes K.
        • Santoni B.G.
        • Frankle M.A.
        Osteoporosis and shoulder osteoarthritis: incidence, risk factors, and surgical implications.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: e1-e8
        • Johnson C.C.
        • Gausden E.B.
        • Weiland A.J.
        • Lane J.M.
        • Schreiber J.J.
        Using Hounsfield units to assess osteoporotic status on wrist computed tomography scans: comparison with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 767-774
        • Rhee S.H.
        • Baek G.H.
        A correlation exists between subchondral bone mineral density of the distal radius and systemic bone mineral density.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 1682-1689
        • Engelke K.
        • Libanati C.
        • Liu Y.
        • et al.
        Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
        Bone. 2009; 45: 110-118
        • Grampp S.
        • Lang P.
        • Jergas M.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
        J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10: 1566-1576
        • Butz S.
        • Wuster C.
        • Scheidt-Nave C.
        • Gotz M.
        • Ziegler R.
        Forearm BMD as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in a German reference population.
        Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4: 179-184
        • Rausch S.
        • Klos K.
        • Gras F.
        • et al.
        Utility of the cortical thickness of the distal radius as a predictor of distal-radius bone density.
        Arch Trauma Res. 2013; 2: 11-15
        • Mather J.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Faber K.J.
        • Athwal G.S.
        Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 732-738
        • Gehlbach S.H.
        • Bigelow C.
        • Heimisdottir M.
        • May S.
        • Walker M.
        • Kirkwood J.R.
        Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.
        Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11: 577-582
        • Lentle B.C.
        • Brown J.P.
        • Khan A.
        • et al.
        Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2007; 58: 27-36
        • Morris C.A.
        • Carrino J.A.
        • Lang P.
        • Solomon D.H.
        Incidental vertebral fractures on chest radiographs: recognition, documentation, and treatment.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 352-356
        • Kumar D.A.
        • Anburajan M.
        The role of hip and chest radiographs in osteoporotic evaluation among south Indian women population: a comparative scenario with DXA.
        J Endocrinol Invest. 2014; 37: 429-440
        • Fowler J.R.
        • Ilyas A.M.
        The accuracy of digital radiography in orthopaedic applications.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 1781-1784
        • Kanis J.A.
        • Johnell O.
        • Oden A.
        • Johansson H.
        • McCloskey E.
        FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.
        Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19: 385-397
        • Feldstein A.C.
        • Nichols G.A.
        • Elmer P.J.
        • Smith D.H.
        • Aickin M.
        • Herson M.
        Older women with fractures: patients falling through the cracks of guideline-recommended osteoporosis screening and treatment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 2294-2302
        • Damilakis J.
        • Adams J.E.
        • Guglielmi G.
        • Link T.M.
        Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis.
        Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2707-2714
        • Nayak S.
        • Roberts M.S.
        • Greenspan S.L.
        Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 751-761