Advertisement
Scientific article| Volume 41, ISSUE 9, e259-e262, September 2016

Download started.

Ok

Dorsal Approach Decreases Operative Time for Complex Metacarpophalangeal Dislocations

      Purpose

      Complex metacarpophalangeal (MCP) dislocations require open surgical reduction, but surgeons disagree about the best surgical approach. We hypothesized that a dorsal approach would require less operative time than would a volar approach and result in a decreased need for a secondary approach.

      Methods

      We performed a retrospective chart review of all isolated irreducible dorsal MCP dislocations treated at 2 level 1 trauma centers between 2005 and 2015. We recorded the initial surgical approach (volar or dorsal), total operative time, and whether the surgeon used a second surgical approach. Operative times for initial volar approach versus initial dorsal approach, hand surgeon versus non-hand surgeon, and thumb versus other digits were compared using the 2-tailed Student t test. We used Fisher exact test to compare the need for a second approach between the volar and dorsal approach groups.

      Results

      A total of 21 patients (22 digits) with MCP dislocations required surgical reduction. Average operative time was longer for the 14 patients who underwent the initial volar approach (70 minutes) than for the 7 who underwent an initial dorsal approach (45 minutes). Six of the 14 MCP joints approached volarly (42%) required a second dorsal approach. None of the 7 patients in the dorsal group required a second approach.

      Conclusions

      Using a dorsal approach to reduce complex MCP dislocations reduces operative time and decreases the need for a secondary approach.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Therapeutic IV.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kaplan E.B.
        Dorsal dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957; 39: 1081-1086
        • Murphy A.F.
        • Stark H.H.
        Closed dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967; 49: 1579-1586
        • Dinh P.
        • Franklin A.
        Metacarpophalangeal joint dislocation.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17: 318-324
        • Mudgal C.S.
        • Mudgal S.
        Volar open reduction of complex metacarpophalangeal dislocation of the index finger: a pictorial essay.
        Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2006; 10: 31-36
        • Durakbasa O.
        • Guneri B.
        The volar surgical approach in complex dorsal metacarpophalangeal dislocations.
        Injury. 2009; 40: 657-659
        • Becton J.L.
        • Christian J.D.
        • Goodwin H.N.
        • Jackson J.G.
        A simplified technique for treating the complex dislocation of the index metacarpophalangeal joint.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57: 698-700
        • Afifi A.M.
        • Medoro A.
        • Salas C.
        • Taha M.R.
        • Cheema T.
        A cadaver model that investigates irreducible metacarpophalangeal joint dislocation.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 1506-1511
        • Patterson R.W.
        • Maschke S.D.
        Dorsal approach for open reduction of complex metacarpophalangeal joint dislocations.
        Orthopedics. 2008; 31: 1099
        • Bohart P.G.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Vandell R.F.
        • Salamon P.B.
        Complex dislocations of the metacarpophalangeal joint.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; : 208-210