Advertisement

Quantitative Assessment of Scalene Muscle Block for the Diagnosis of Suspected Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Published:September 28, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.08.015

      Purpose

      To measure changes in upper limb work and power capacity before and after anterior scalene muscle block (ASMB) to suggest thoracic outlet syndrome caused by costoclavicular space compression.

      Methods

      We evaluated 34 patients disabled by symptoms suggesting thoracic outlet syndrome. An ASMB was performed via a supraclavicular injection. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was injected as a control. We captured data obtained from work simulator measurements before and after ASMB. Each patient performed a push–pull test with the forearm at waist level (test 1), an overhead bar push–pull test with the arm elevated (test 2), and the extremity abduction stress test with repetitive hand gripping during static arm elevation (test 3). We measured the work product, time to fatigue, and power generation. Sensory testing was performed after ASMB to rule out improved performance associated with possible sensory nerve block.

      Results

      In contrast to sternocleidomastoid injection controls, symptomatic and functional improvement was noted in all patients (n = 34) after ASMB. Work product measurement improved 93%, 108%, and 104% for tests 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Time to fatigue and power output also increased after the block.

      Conclusions

      Temporary symptomatic improvement after ASMB may be anticipated in patients with TOS. This study documents a significant concurrent increase in upper limb motor function after the block. Increased work and power measurements after ASMB may draw diagnostic inference regarding a dynamic change in the scalene muscle and the costoclavicular space associated with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome.

      Type of study/level of evidence

      Diagnostic III.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sanders R.J.
        • Haug C.
        Subclavian vein obstruction and thoracic outlet syndrome: a review of etiology and management.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 1990; 4: 397-410
        • Wright I.S.
        The neurovascular syndrome produced by hyperabduction of the arms: the immediate changes produced in 150 normal controls, and the effects on some persons of prolonged hyperabduction of the arms, as in sleeping, and in certain occupations.
        Am Heart J. 1945; 29: 1-19
        • Leffert R.D.
        Thoracic outlet syndrome.
        in: Gelberman R.H. Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA1991: 1177-1195
        • Sanders R.J.
        • Haug C.E.
        Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Common Sequela of Neck Injuries.
        Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA1991
        • Roos D.B.
        Congenital anomalies associated with thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Am J Surg. 1976; 132: 771-778
        • Falconer M.
        • Weddell G.
        Costoclavicular compression of the subclavian artery and vein.
        Lancet. 1943; 242: 539-544
        • Atasoy E.
        Thoracic outlet compression syndrome.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1996; 27: 265-303
        • Urschel H.C.
        • Razzuk M.A.
        • Hyland J.W.
        • et al.
        Thoracic outlet syndrome masquerading as coronary artery disease (pseudoangina).
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1973; 16: 239-248
        • Raskin N.H.
        • Howard M.W.
        • Ehrenfeld W.K.
        Headache as the leading symptom of the thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Headache J Head Face Pain. 1985; 25: 208-210
        • Sanders R.J.
        • Hammond S.L.
        • Rao N.M.
        Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.
        J Vasc Surg. 2007; 46: 601-604
        • Brantigan C.O.
        • Roos D.B.
        Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Hand Clin. 2004; 20: 27-36
        • Gillard J.
        • Pérez-Cousin M.
        • Hachulla É.
        • et al.
        Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome: contribution of provocative tests, ultrasonography, electrophysiology, and helical computed tomography in 48 patients.
        J Bone Spine. 2001; 68: 416-424
        • Gage M.
        Scalenus anticus syndrome: a diagnostic and confirmatory test.
        Surgery. 1939; 5: 599-601
        • Braun R.M.
        • Sahadevan D.C.
        • Feinstein J.
        Confirmatory needle placement technique for scalene muscle block in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2006; 10: 173-176
        • Jordan S.E.
        • Machleder H.I.
        Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome using electrophysiologically guided anterior scalene blocks.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 1998; 12: 260-264
        • Jordan S.E.
        • Ahn S.S.
        • Freischlag J.A.
        • Gelabert H.A.
        • Machleder H.I.
        Selective botulinum chemodenervation of the scalene muscles for treatment of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2000; 14: 365-369
        • Bell J.
        Sensibility testing.
        in: Hunter J. Schneider L. Mackin E. Bell J. Rehabilitation of the Hand. CV Mosby, Philadelphia, PA1978: 269-291
        • Veilleux M.
        • Stevens J.C.
        • Campbell J.K.
        Somatosensory evoked potentials: lack of value for diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Muscle Nerve. 1988; 11: 571-575
        • Smith T.
        Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 1161
        • Seror P.
        Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction study, a new tool to demonstrate mild lower brachial plexus lesions: a report of 16 cases.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115: 2316-2322
        • Adson A.
        Surgical treatment for symptoms produced by cervical ribs and the scalenus anticus muscle.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1947; 85: 687-700
        • Woods W.
        Personal experience with surgical treatment of 250 cases of cervical brachial neurovascular compression syndrome.
        J Int Coll Surg. 1965; 44: 273-283
        • Warrens A.N.
        • Heaton J.M.
        Thoracic outlet compression syndrome: the lack of reliability of its clinical assessment.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987; 69: 203-204
        • Roos D.B.
        Thoracic outlet syndrome.
        Arch Surg. 1966; 93: 71
        • Sanders R.J.
        • Pearce W.H.
        The treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome: a comparison of different operations.
        J Vasc Surg. 1989; 10: 626-634
        • Collins J.
        • Shaver M.
        • Disher A.
        • Miller T.
        Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus and peripheral nerve imaging: technique and 3 dimensional color.
        in: Omer G. Spinner M. Van Beek A. Management of Peripheral Nerve Problems. 2nd ed. WB Sanders, Philadelphia, PA1998: 82-93
        • Martin D.
        TOS—thoracic outlet syndrome or terribly obscure subject? An approach for the disability evaluating physician.
        Disability. 1998; 7: 25-35
        • Telford E.D.
        • Mottershead S.
        Pressure at the cervico-brachial junction.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948; 30: 249-265