Advertisement
The Journal of Hand Surgery
ASSH
Advanced searchSave search
Abstract| Volume 39, ISSUE 9, SUPPLEMENT , e29, September 2014

Download started.

Ok

Outcomes of Revision Surgical Treatment of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Level 3 Evidence
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.068
Outcomes of Revision Surgical Treatment of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Previous ArticleSimultaneous Bilateral Versus Staged Unilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Next ArticleDo Preoperative Nerve Studies Predict Time to Resolution of Symptoms After Carpal Tunnel Release?
      Patients undergoing revision surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow for cubital tunnel syndrome will have worse results compared to patients successfully treated with primary surgery.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shi Q.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Santaguida P.L.
        • Kyu H.H.
        Predictors of surgical outcomes following anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 1996-2001.e6
        • Nellans K.
        • Tang P.
        Evaluation and treatment of failed ulnar nerve release at the elbow.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2012; 43: 487-494
        • Chung K.C.
        Treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 1625-1627
        • Zlowodzki M.
        • Chan S.
        • Bhandari M.
        • Kalliainen L.
        • Schubert W.
        Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 2591-2598
        • Lowe J.B.
        • Mackinnon S.E.
        Management of secondary cubital tunnel syndrome.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: e1-e16
        • Macadam S.A.
        • Gandhi R.
        • Bezuhly M.
        • Lefaivre K.A.
        Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33A: 1314-1324
        • Gabel G.T.
        • Amadio P.
        Reoperation for failed decompression of the ulnar nerve in the region of the elbow.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 213-219
        • Vogel R.B.
        • Nossaman B.C.
        • Rayan G.M.
        Revision anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed subcutaneous transposition.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2004; 57: 311-316
        • Caputo A.E.
        • Watson H.K.
        Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2000; 25: 544-551
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        • Sutter M.
        • Martens E.
        • Manske P.R.
        Incidence of re-operation and subjective outcome following in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009; 34: 379-383

      Article info

      Publication history

      Paper 41

      Footnotes

      Clinical Paper Session 07: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

      Friday, September 19, 2014 • 1:59–2:06 PM

      Category: Prognosis/Outcomes

      Keyword: Elbow and Forearm, Nerve

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.068

      Copyright

      © 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX