Simultaneous carpal tunnel release (CTR) is more cost effective than staged CTR when surgery is indicated for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1285-1295
- The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.J Health Econ. 2002; 21: 271-292
- Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.J Amer Med Assoc. 1996; 276: 1253-1258
- Endoscopic versus open tunnel release: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 1089-1099
- A methodological guide to performing a cost-utility study comparing surgical techniques.Can J Plast Surg. 2004; 12: 179-187
- A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.Can J Plast Surg. 2006; 14: 15-20
Clinical Paper Session 07: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Friday, September 19, 2014 • 1:52–1:59 PM
Category: Treatment, Surgical Technique, Prognosis/Outcomes
Keyword: Hand and Wrist, Nerve
© 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.