Advertisement
Scientific article| Volume 39, ISSUE 2, P256-261, February 2014

Download started.

Ok

Biomechanical Characteristics of Suture Anchor Implants for Flexor Digitorum Profundus Repair

  • Gabriel Halát
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Gabriel Halát, MD, University Clinic for Trauma Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lukas Negrin
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Thomas Koch
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jochen Erhart
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Patrick Platzer
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Stefan Hajdu
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Johannes Streicher
    Affiliations
    University Clinic for Trauma Surgery and the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University Vienna; and the Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author

      Purpose

      To determine strength and failure characteristics of 2 suture anchors used to repair simulated flexor digitorum profundus avulsions during passive mobilization protocol simulation.

      Methods

      We simulated avulsion of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon in 30 distal phalanges from fresh-frozen human cadavers. Repair was performed with a 1.3 × 3.7 mm Micro-Mitek suture anchor (3-0 Orthocord suture) and a 2.2 × 4.0-mm Corkscrew suture anchor (2-0 FiberWire suture). All specimens were loaded cyclically from 2 to 15 N at 5 N/s for a total of 500 cycles. Samples were tested to failure at the completion of 500 cycles. Load at failure, load at first noteworthy displacement (> 2 mm), elongation of the system, gap formation at the tendon–bone interface, and the mechanism of failure were assessed.

      Results

      Suture failure at maximum load was the prevalent failure mechanism in both groups. No statistically significant difference in elongation of the tendon–suture complex was observed. The Corkscrew suture anchor showed a significantly superior performance in load to failure, load at first significant displacement, and gap formation at the tendon–bone interface.

      Conclusions

      The significantly higher load capacity at first displacement (> 2 mm) and the significance of a lower gap formation at the repair site seem to be the most relevant clinical parameters. Based on this concept, the Corkscrew anchor may be superior biomechanically to the Micro-Mitek when considering an early passive mobilization protocol.

      Clinical relevance

      The choice of an appropriate implant may influence the postoperative mobilization protocol and thereby improve currently reported success rates. Defining a biomechanically superior implant will provide an essential basis for further studies in flexor tendon repair research.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McMaster P.E.
        Tendon and muscle ruptures: clinical and experimental studies on the causes and locations of subcutaneous ruptures.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1933; 15: 705-722
        • Leddy J.P.
        Avulsions of the flexor digitorum profundus.
        Hand Clin. 1985; 1: 77-83
        • Leddy J.P.
        • Packer J.W.
        Avulsion of the profundus tendon insertion in athletes.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1977; 2: 66-69
        • Becker H.
        Primary repair of flexor tendons in the hand without immobilization—preliminary report.
        Hand. 1978; 10: 37-47
        • Kang N.
        • Pratt A.
        • Burr N.
        Miniplate fixation for avulsion injuries of the flexor digitorum profundus insertion.
        J Hand Surg Br. 2003; 28: 363-368
        • Skoff H.D.
        • Hecker A.T.
        • Hayes W.C.
        • Sebell-Sklar R.
        • Straughn N.
        Bone suture anchors in hand surgery.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1995; 20: 245-248
        • Zook E.G.
        • Russell R.C.
        Reconstruction of a functional and esthetic nail.
        Hand Clin. 1990; 6: 59-68
        • Brustein M.
        • Pellegrini J.
        • Choueka J.
        • Heminger H.
        • Mass D.
        Bone suture anchors versus the pullout button for repair of distal profundus tendon injuries: a comparison of strength in human cadaveric hands.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26: 489-496
        • McCallister W.V.
        • Ambrose H.C.
        • Katolik L.I.
        • Trumble T.E.
        Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31: 246-251
        • Moiemen N.S.
        • Elliot D.
        Primary flexor tendon repair in zone 1.
        J Hand Surg Br. 2000; 25: 78-84
        • Becker H.
        • Orak F.
        • Duponselle E.
        Early active motion following a beveled technique of flexor tendon repair: report on fifty cases.
        J Hand Surg. 1979; 4: 454-460
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Tolhurst P.
        • Lang D.
        • Page R.E.
        Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilisation.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1989; 14: 392-395
        • Deakin M.
        • Stubbs D.
        • Bruce W.
        • Goldberg J.
        • Gillies R.M.
        • Walsh W.R.
        Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.
        J Arthrosc. 2005; 21: 1447-1451
        • Hartmann D.
        • Gérard F.
        • Garbuio P.
        • Tropet Y.
        Results of primary repair of isolated flexor digitorum profundis lesions in the digital canal: 51 cases.
        Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1996; 15: 18-24
        • Ejeskär A.
        • Irstam L.
        Elongation in profundus tendon repair: a clinical and radiological study.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 15: 61-68
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Brodt M.D.
        • Winters S.C.
        • Silva M.J.
        The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons: an experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 975-982
        • Seradge H.
        Elongation of the repair configuration following flexor tendon repair.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1983; 8: 182-185
        • Silfverskiöld K.L.
        • May E.J.
        • Törnvall A.H.
        Gap formation during controlled motion after flexor tendon repair in zone II: a prospective clinical study.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17: 539-546
        • Feehan L.M.
        • Beauchene J.G.
        Early tensile properties of healing chicken flexor tendons: early controlled passive motion versus postoperative immobilization.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1990; 15: 63-68
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Menon J.
        • Gonsalves M.
        • Akeson W.H.
        The effects of mobilization on the vascularization of healing flexor tendons in dogs.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; : 283-289
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Vandeberg J.S.
        • Manske P.R.
        • Akeson W.H.
        The early stages of flexor tendon healing: a morphologic study of the first fourteen days.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1985; 10: 776-784
        • Takai S.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Horibe S.
        • Tung D.K.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        The effects of frequency and duration of controlled passive mobilization on tendon healing.
        J Orthop Res. 1991; 9: 705-713
        • Woo S.L.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Cobb N.G.
        • Amiel D.
        • Lothringer K.
        • Akeson W.H.
        The importance of controlled passive mobilization on flexor tendon healing: a biomechanical study.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1981; 52: 615-622
        • Savage R.
        In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1985; 10: 135-141
        • Lee H.
        Double loop locking suture: a technique of tendon repair for early active mobilization. Part II: clinical experience.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1990; 15: 953-958
        • Mashadi Z.B.
        • Amis A.A.
        Strength of the suture in the epitenon and within the tendon fibres: development of stronger peripheral suture technique.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1992; 17: 171-175
        • Mass D.P.
        • Tuel R.J.
        • Labarbera M.
        • Greenwald D.P.
        Effects of constant mechanical tension on the healing of rabbit flexor tendons.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; : 301-306
        • Sanders D.W.
        • Milne A.D.
        • Dobravec A.
        • MacDermid J.
        • Johnson J.A.
        • King G.J.
        Cyclic testing of flexor tendon repairs: an in vitro biomechanical study.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1997; 22: 1004-1010
        • Pruitt D.L.
        • Manske P.R.
        • Fink B.
        Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1991; 16: 701-707
        • Pruitt D.L.
        • Tanaka H.
        • Aoki M.
        • Manske P.R.
        Cyclic stress testing after in vivo healing of canine flexor tendon lacerations.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21: 974-977
        • Williams R.J.
        • Amis A.A.
        A new type of flexor tendon repair: biomechanical evaluation by cyclic loading, ultimate strength and assessment of pulley friction in vitro.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1995; 20: 578-583
        • Latendresse K.
        • Dona E.
        • Scougall P.J.
        • Schreuder F.B.
        • Puchert E.
        • Walsh W.R.
        Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and Micro-Mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2005; 30: 471-478
        • Schreuder F.
        • Scougall P.J.
        • Puchert E.
        • Vizesi F.
        • Walsh W.R.
        The effect of Mitek anchor insertion angle to attachment of FDP avulsion injuries.
        J Hand Surg Br. 2006; 31: 292-295
        • Ilahi O.A.
        • Younas S.A.
        • Ho D.M.
        • Noble P.C.
        Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 2407-2414
        • Schuind F.
        • Garcia-Elias M.
        • Cooney III, W.P.
        • An K.N.
        Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17: 291-298
        • Strickland J.W.
        Flexor Tendons—Acute Injuries.
        Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, PA1999
        • Burkhart S.S.
        The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 119-123