Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) [corrected].Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 602-608
- Measuring outcomes in hand surgery.Clin Plast Surg. 2008; 35: 239-250
- Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys.J Orthop Res. 2002; 20: 1146-1151
- Data collection outcomes comparing paper forms with PDA forms in an office-based patient survey.Ann Fam Med. 2008; 6: 154-160
- Scoring the DASH outcome measure.Accessed: August 10, 2012)
- A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006; 6: 23
- Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.Value Health. 2009; 12: 419-429
- Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration?.J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 135-140
- Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study.Qual Life Res. 1995; 4: 21-26
- A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire.Med Care. 2001; 39: 181-189
- Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation?.Qual Life Res. 2001; 10 (S): 683-691
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.