Advertisement
Scientific article| Volume 34, ISSUE 3, P458-462, March 2009

Download started.

Ok

Dose Effectiveness of Transthecal Digital Block

  • Thanapong Waitayawinyu
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Thanapong Waitayawinyu, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thammasat University, Paholyothin Road, Klongluang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; and the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
    Search for articles by this author
  • Seth D. Dodds
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; and the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sunyarn Niempoog
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; and the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
    Search for articles by this author

      Purpose

      The optimal volume of local anesthetic for transthecal digital block has not yet been identified. The goal of this study was to understand the effect of different volumes of local anesthetic using a modified transthecal digital block.

      Methods

      We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study with normal volunteers. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving 1, 2, or 3 mL of 1% lidocaine using a modified transthecal digital block. An investigator blinded to the assignment of subjects and dosages evaluated the onset, progression, and duration of anesthesia. Threshold sensory testing was performed every minute in the first 10-minute period and then at 15-minute intervals up to 85 minutes. Pain was assessed after infiltration using the visual analog scale.

      Results

      A total of 45 blocks (15 subjects for each dosage) were performed. None of the volunteers who received 1-mL of block had adequate anesthesia. Mean onset of anesthesia with the 2-mL blocks was >6 minutes, whereas those of the 3-mL blocks took only 1.5 minutes. The mean progression and duration of anesthesia were quicker and longer, respectively, in the 3-mL blocks than the 2-mL ones. Pain associated with injection and discomfort after injection in the 2- and 3-mL blocks was not different, but was significantly higher than the 1-mL block.

      Conclusions

      The effectiveness of the 3-mL modified transthecal digital block is greater than the 1- and 2-mL blocks in terms of rapidity of onset, completeness, and duration of anesthesia.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chiu D.T.W.
        Transthecal digital block: flexor tendon sheath used for anesthetic infusion.
        J Hand Surg. 1990; 15A: 471-473
        • Whetzel T.P.
        • Mubourakh S.
        • Barkhordar R.
        Modified transthecal digital block.
        J Hand Surg. 1997; 22A: 361-363
        • Hill R.G.
        • Patterson J.W.
        • Parker J.C.
        • Bauer J.
        • Wright E.
        • Heller M.B.
        Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 5: 604-607
        • Hung V.S.
        • Bodavula V.K.R.
        • Dubin N.H.
        Digital anaesthesia: comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques.
        J Hand Surg. 2005; 30B: 581-584
        • Morrison W.G.
        Transthecal digital block.
        Arch Emerg Med. 1993; 10: 35-38
        • Cummings A.J.
        • Tisol W.B.
        • Meyer L.E.
        Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.
        J Hand Surg. 2004; 29A: 44-48
        • Torok P.J.
        • Flinn S.D.
        • Shin A.Y.
        Transthecal digital block at the proximal phalanx.
        J Hand Surg. 2001; 26B: 69-71
        • Sarhadi N.S.
        • Shaw-Dunn J.
        Tranthecal digital nerve block: an anatomic appraisal.
        J Hand Surg. 1998; 23B: 490-493
        • Keramidas E.G.
        • Rodopoulou S.G.
        • Tsoutsos D.
        • Miller G.
        • Ioannovich J.
        Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 1131-1134