Original Communications| Volume 25, ISSUE 6, P1122-1126, November 2000

A comparison of four repair techniques for Champer's chiasma flexor digitorium superficialis lacerations: Tested in an in vitro model


      The relative strengths of 4 methods for repair of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon were examined in 14 fresh-frozen cadaver hands (40 tendons). All tendons underwent sharp zone II transection at Camper's chiasma. All transections were repaired with 4.0 Ethibond (Ethicon Inc, Sommerville, NJ) using modified Becker, modified Kessler, horizontal mattress, or simple sutures. Flexion of the repaired digit at a constant excursion rate was rendered up to tendon rupture. The modified Becker technique withstood breaking forces (57.9 N) significantly greater than the other techniques examined. Forces up to 34 N have been measured in vivo during unresisted active finger motion. Thus, the modified Becker technique appears to provide adequate strength for early active flexor digitorum superficialis motion. (J Hand Surg 2000;25A:1122-1126. Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Strickland JW.
        Flexor tendon injuries. Part II: flexor tendon repair.
        Orthop Rev. 1986; 15: 701-721
        • Schuind F
        • Garcia-Elias M
        • Cooney III, WP
        • An K-N.
        Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements.
        J Hand Surg. 1992; 17A: 291-298
        • Savage R.
        In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair.
        J Hand Surg. 1985; 10B: 135-141
        • Urbaniak JR
        • Cahill Jr, JD
        • Mortenson RA.
        Tendon suturing methods: analysis of tensile strengths. In: AAOS: Symposium of tendon surgery in the hand.
        CV Mosby, St Louis1975
        • Strickland JW.
        Flexor tendon injuries. Part I: anatomy, physiology, biomechanics, healing, and adhesion formation around a repaired tendon.
        Orthop Rev. 1986; 15: 632-645
        • Boulas HJ
        • Strickland JW.
        Strength and functional recovery following repair of flexor digitorum superficialis in zone 2.
        J Hand Surg. 1993; 18B: 22-25
        • Stein T
        • Ali A
        • Hamman J
        • Mass DP.
        A randomized biomechanical study of zone II human flexor tendon repairs analyzed in an in vitro model.
        J Hand Surg. 1998; 23A: 1046-1051
        • Greenwald DP
        • Hong H-Z
        • May Jr., JW
        Mechanical analysis of tendon suture techniques.
        J Hand Surg. 1994; 19A: 641-647
        • Greenwald D
        • Shumway S
        • Allen C
        • Mass D.
        Dynamic analysis of profundus tendon function.
        J Hand Surg. 1994; 19A: 626-635
        • Diao E
        • Hariharan JS
        • Soejima O
        • Lotz JC.
        Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs.
        J Hand Surg. 1996; 21A: 234-239
        • Komanduri M
        • Phillips CS
        • Mass DP.
        Tensile strength of flexor tendon repairs in a dynamic cadaver model.
        J Hand Surg. 1996; 21A: 605-611
        • Becker H
        • Davidoff M.
        Eliminating the gap in flexor tendon surgery: a new method of suture.
        Hand. 1977; 9: 306-311
        • Cullen KW
        • Tolhurst P
        • Land D
        • Page RE.
        Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilisation.
        J Hand Surg. 1989; 14B: 392-395