Original Communications| Volume 25, ISSUE 2, P330-340, March 2000

Download started.


Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture


      We evaluated the responsiveness of patient questionnaires and physical testing in the assessment of recovery after distal radius fracture. Patients (n = 59) were assessed at their baseline clinic visit and again 3 and 6 months after injury. At each visit patients completed a short form-36, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). At 3 and 6 months grip strength, range of motion, and dexterity were analyzed. Standardized response means (SRM) and effects sizes were calculated to indicate responsiveness. The PRWE was the most responsive. Both the PRWE (SRM = 2.27) and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (SRM = 2.01) questionnaire were more responsive than the short form-36 (SRM = 0.92). The physical component summary score of the short form-36 was similar to that of the physical component subscales. Questionnaires were highly responsive during the 0- to 3-month time period when physical testing could not be performed. Of the physical tests, grip strength was most responsive, followed by range of motion. Responsive patient-rating scales and physical performance evaluations can assist with outcome evaluation of patients with distal radius fracture. (J Hand Surg 2000;25A:330–340. Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand).


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Larsen CF
        • Lauritsen J.
        Epidemiology of acute wrist trauma.
        Int J Epidemiol. 1993; 22: 911
        • McMurtry RY
        • Jupiter JB.
        Fractures of the distal radius.
        in: Skeletal trauma.Vol. 2. : WB Saunders, Philadelphia1996: 1063
        • Sarmiento A
        • Zagorski JB
        • Sinclair WF.
        Functional bracing of Colles' fractures: a prospective study of immobilization in supination vs. pronation.
        Clin Orthop. 1980; 146: 175-183
        • Ware Jr, JE
        • Snow KS
        • Kosinski M
        • Gandek B
        SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide.
        : The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston1993
        • Hudak PL
        • Amadio PC
        • Bombardier C
        • the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group
        Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head[sic]).
        Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 602-608
        • MacDermid JC.
        Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability.
        J Hand Ther. 1996; 9: 178-183
        • MacDermid JC
        • Turgeon T
        • Richards RS
        • Beadle M
        • Roth JH.
        Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool.
        J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12: 577-586
        • Fernandez JJ
        • Gruen GS
        • Herndon JH.
        Outcome of distal radius fractures using the short form 36 health survey.
        Clin Orthop. 1997; 341: 36-41
        • Kirshner B
        • Guyatt G.
        A methodological framework for assessing health indices.
        J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38: 27-36
        • Wright JG
        • Young NL.
        A comparison of different indices of responsiveness.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 239-246
        • Norman GR
        • Stratford P
        • Regehr G.
        Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 869-879
        • Stratford PW
        • Binkley JM
        • Riddle DL.
        Health status measures: stategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores.
        Phys Ther. 1996; 76: 1109-1123
        • Liang MH
        • Fossel AH
        • Larson MG.
        Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation.
        Med Care. 1990; 28: 632-642
        • Kazis LE
        • Anderson JJ
        • Meenan RF.
        Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.
        Med Care. 1989; 27: S178-S189
        • Amadio PC
        • Silverstein MD
        • Ilstrup DM
        • Schleck CD
        • Jensen LM.
        Outcome after Colles fracture: the relative responsiveness of three questionnaires and physical examination measures.
        J Hand Surg. 1996; 21A: 781-787
        • Katz JN
        • Gelberman RH
        • Wright EA
        • Lew RA
        • Liang MH.
        Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Med Care. 1994; 32: 1127-1133
        • Ware Jr, JE
        • Kosinski M
        • Keller SD.
        SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual.
        in: : The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston1994: 1.1-1012
        • The Upper Limb Collaborative Group
        Measuring disability and symptoms of the upper limb: a validation study of the DASH questionnaire.
        Arthritis Rheum. 1996; 39 (abstr): S112
        • Fess EE.
        Grip strength.
        in: 2nd ed. Clinical assessment recommendations. : American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago1992: 41-46
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Weber K
        • Volland G
        • Kashman N.
        Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.
        J Hand Surg. 1984; 9A: 222-226
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Kashman N
        • Volland G
        • Weber K
        • Dowe M
        • Rogers S.
        Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985; 66: 69-72
        • LaStayo PC
        • Wheeler DL.
        Reliability of passive wrist flexion and extension goniometric measurements: a multicenter study.
        Phys Ther. 1994; 74: 162-174
        • Norkin CC
        • White DJ.
        Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry.
        in: 2nd ed. : FA Davis, Philadelphia1995: 1-149
        • Armstrong AD
        • MacDermid JC
        • Chinchalkar S
        • Stevens RS
        • King GJW.
        Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 573-580
        • Jebsen RH
        • Taylor N
        • Trieschmann RB
        • Trotter MJ
        • Howard LA.
        An objective and standardized test of hand function.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969; 50: 311-319
        • Wright JG
        • Young NL.
        The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1997; 79A: 974-983
        • Beaton DE
        • Hogg-Johnson S
        • Bombardier C.
        Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 79-93
        • Martin DP
        • Engelberg R
        • Agel J
        • Swiontkowski MF.
        Comparison of the musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire with the short form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, and the sickness impact profile health-status measures.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1997; 79A: 1323-1335
        • L'Insalata JC
        • Warren RF
        • Cohen SB
        • Altchek DW
        • Peterson MG
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1997; 79A: 738-748
        • Hurst NP
        • Kind P
        • Ruta D
        • Hunter M
        • Stubbings A.
        Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D).
        Br J Rheumatol. 1997; 36: 551-559
        • Turgeon TR
        • MacDermid JC
        • Roth JH.
        Reliability of the NK dexterity board.
        J Hand Ther. 1999; 12: 7-15
        • Stucki G
        • Liang MH
        • Phillips C
        • Katz JN.
        The short form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty.
        Arthritis Care Res. 1995; 8: 174-181
        • Beurskens AJHM
        • de Vet HCW
        • Köke AJA.
        Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.
        Pain. 1996; 65: 71-76