Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 398-405, March 2010

Comparison of Functional Outcome After Volar Plate Fixation With 2.4-mm Titanium Versus 3.5-mm Stainless-Steel Plate for Extra-Articular Fracture of Distal Radius

Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; BG-Unfallklinik, Ludwigshafen, Germany; and Marta Marent-Huber, AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Dübendorf, Switzerland

Received 19 April 2009; accepted 24 November 2009. published online 08 February 2010.

Purpose

Open reduction and locked volar plate and screw fixation is a popular treatment method for extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal metaphyseal comminution. In this study, we compared the use of a titanium 2.4-mm precontoured plate with that of a stainless-steel oblique 3.5-mm T-shaped plate to test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in wrist function or upper extremity–specific health status in the internal fixation of AO-type A3.2 distal radius fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients treated with a 2.4-mm titanium plate and 38 patients treated with a 3.5-mm stainless-steel plate for an extra-articular and dorsally angulated distal radius fracture, from data gathered in a prospective cohort study of plate and screw fixation of distal radius fractures. The 2 cohorts were analyzed for differences in motion, grip strength, pain, Gartland and Werley score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, and Short Form-36 score at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. Group differences and their change over time were determined using regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test.

Results

There were no significant differences in wrist function and arm-specific health status between patients treated with a 2.4-mm plate and those treated with a 3.5-mm plate at 6, 12, or 24 months of follow-up. However, we observed a trend toward greater wrist flexion at 1 year (66° vs 55°; p=.07) and greater flexion–extension arc (137° vs 123°; p=.08) and pronation–supination arc (172° vs 160°; p=.07) at 24 months after surgery in patients treated with a 2.4-mm plate.

Conclusions

Patients with a dorsally angulated extra-articular distal radius facture can expect similar results when treated with either a precontoured 2.4-mm titanium plate or a 3.5-mm stainless-steel T-shaped plate.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Key words: Distal radius fracture, open reduction and internal fixation, plate and screws, outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was supported by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Center for Investigation and Documentation. D.R. received unrestricted research grants from Small Bone Innovations, Smith and Nephew, Wright Medical, Acumed, and Tornier. D.R. received royalties from Hand Innovation and is a paid consultant for Smith and Nephew, Wright Medical, Acumed, and Tornier.

PII: S0363-5023(09)01058-2

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.023

Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 398-405, March 2010