Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 430-436, March 2010

Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in Patients With Hand Injury

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, En Chu Kong Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Occupation Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Received 6 April 2009; accepted 18 November 2009. published online 08 February 2010.

Purpose

To compare responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) with that of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in patients with hand injuries. We postulated that the MHQ may be more sensitive to functional changes in the hands, whereas the DASH questionnaire would have a closer association with days of disability.

Methods

Patients with hand injuries were consecutively recruited from 2 community hospitals. Each patient was asked to complete out the MHQ, the DASH questionnaire, the satisfaction with their health-related quality of life (Sat-HRQOL) measure, and Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ), which is a measure of psychological stressors. Disability days were defined as the duration of restricted activities of daily living during the previous 4 weeks. Patients repeated the same questionnaires between 2 and 9 months after enrollment (average: 4 mo).

Results

A total of 105 patients with hand injuries were recruited, and 50 of the 105 patients returned for the second evaluation. There were no statistical differences between responders and nonresponders for age, gender, disability days, the MHQ, the DASH questionnaire, the CHQ, or the Sat-HRQOL. Responsiveness was evaluated by effect sizes and standardized response means: Those for the MHQ were 0.84 and 1.05, and those for the DASH were 0.67 and 0.86, respectively. A mixed model analysis for repeated measurements of the 50 participants showed a significant influence of psychological factors (CHQ) for both the Sat-HRQOL and disability days. After adjustment for the effects of age, gender, and the CHQ, there was an increment of one Sat-HRQOL unit for an MHQ score increment of 3.2, whereas the score decrement for the DASH questionnaire was 3.3 units.

Conclusions

The MHQ might be slightly more sensitive to functional changes, but the DASH questionnaire seemed more correlated with disability days. Psychological factors are the strongest determinants of the HRQOL and disability.

Key words: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, hand injury, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), responsiveness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a grant from Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch (TCRD-TPE-95-20), and partially supported by a grant from the National Science Council, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (95WFA0101282).

 No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

PII: S0363-5023(09)01024-7

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.016

Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 430-436, March 2010