Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 312-318, March 2005

Structural properties of reconstruction constructs for the interosseous ligament of the forearm

  • Kathryne J. Stabile, MS

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Jamie Pfaeffle, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Ioannis Saris, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Zong-Ming Li, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Matthew M. Tomaino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Matthew M. Tomaino, MD, MBA, Department of Orthopaedics, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642.

Received 10 March 2004; accepted 9 November 2004.

Purpose

The Essex-Lopresti fracture–dislocation, also termed longitudinal radioulnar dissociation (LRUD), results in major functional impairment from pain and limitation of motion at the wrist and elbow. Interosseous ligament (IOL) reconstruction has been proposed to help treat LRUD and restore forearm stability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical structural properties of 3 different IOL reconstruction constructs and of the intact IOL for comparison.

Methods

Structural tensile testing was performed on 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric forearms with 4 different forearm conditions: IOL intact and IOL reconstructed with Achilles tendon, flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon, and bone–patellar tendon–bone. Isolated radius–IOL–ulna constructs were loaded to failure in a materials testing machine with force applied along the local fiber direction.

Results

Stiffness in the intact IOL was 129 ± 31 N/mm, which was significantly stiffer than any of the constructs tested. The intact IOL was 8 times stiffer than the Achilles tendon construct, 7 times stiffer than the FCR construct, and 3 times stiffer than the bone–patellar tendon–bone construct. The Achilles tendon and FCR constructs were similar to each other biomechanically but the bone–patellar tendon–bone construct was slightly stiffer than the Achilles tendon and FCR constructs.

Conclusions

All graft constructs tested were inferior structurally to the intact IOL. The results of this study provide a biomechanical basis for graft selection for reconstruction of the IOL.

Key words:  Interosseous ligament , reconstruction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.Supported by the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation and Avanta Orthopaedics.

PII: S0363-5023(04)00869-X

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.11.018

Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 312-318, March 2005