Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 595-604, July 2004

The correction of ulnar claw fingers: a follow-up study comparing the extensor-to-flexor with the palmaris longus 4-tailed tendon transfer in patients with leprosy1

  • Nathan L Taylor, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nathan L. Taylor, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 96th Surgical Operations Squadron, Eglin AFB, 1205 Basin Creek Cove, Niceville, FL 32578 USA
  • ,
  • A.Dorai Raj

      Affiliations

    • Schieffelin Leprosy Research & Training Center, Karigiri, Tamil Nadu, India
  • ,
  • Harold M Dick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Samuel Solomon, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Schieffelin Leprosy Research & Training Center, Karigiri, Tamil Nadu, India

Received 30 March 2001; accepted 1 March 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose

The extensor to flexor 4-tailed tendon transfer (EF4T) and the palmaris longus 4-tailed tendon transfer (PL4T) are 2 surgical procedures used to correct intrinsic paralysis of the hand in leprosy. The EF4T traditionally is the more common procedure and requires the transfer of a wrist extensor muscle. The PL4T requires the transfer of the palmaris longus and morbidity is expected to be lower. A follow-up study was performed to determine whether the clinical outcome of the PL4T is superior to the EF4T procedure in leprosy patients with ulnar claw fingers that are considered mobile before surgery.

Methods

Fifty-five patients presented 65 affected hands, of which 40 hands had the PL4T and 25 had the EF4T procedure. Each hand was assessed before surgery and at follow-up evaluation by predetermined angle measurements, standardized photographs, mechanical function, and patient satisfaction. Each hand was given an overall technical grade according to previously published standards.

Results

After an average follow-up period of 33 months there was no statistically significant difference in the technical outcome or patient satisfaction between the 2 tendon transfer procedures.

Conclusions

Whenever the palmaris longus is available it may be considered to be the motor tendon of choice to undertake a many-tailed procedure for claw finger reconstruction in mobile hands paralyzed by leprosy. The palmaris longus should be considered as a possible motor tendon when correcting intrinsic muscle paralysis of the hand.

Keywords:  Claw fingers, intrinsic paralysis, palmaris longus, tendon transfer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • 1 No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

 Supported by a grant from the Milton Rosenbluth Foundation, New York, NY.

PII: S0363-5023(04)00219-9

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.03.006

Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 595-604, July 2004