Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 140-143, January 2004

Clinical examination versus routine and paraspinal electromyographic studies in predicting the site of lesion in brachial plexus injury 1

  • G Balakrishnan, MCh

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Research and Rehabilitation of the Hand and Department of Plastic Surgery, Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: G. Balakrishnan, MS, 83, Mayor Ramanathan Rd, Chetpet, Chennai-600031, India
  • ,
  • Bharath K Kadadi, MS

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Research and Rehabilitation of the Hand and Department of Plastic Surgery, Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India

Received 25 March 2003; received in revised form 6 August 2003; accepted 6 August 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose

To study the role of clinical examination, routine electromyography (EMG), and paraspinal EMG individually and in combination to predict the site of lesion in brachial plexus injury.

Methods

Forty cases of brachial plexus injury were evaluated clinically. They then were subjected to routine and paraspinal EMG. All of them underwent surgical exploration and the intraoperative findings were correlated.

Results

The combination of clinical examination, routine EMG, and paraspinal EMG was able to localize the site of the lesion in 80% of patients in both intra- and extraforaminal injury and in 67% in those with a combination type of lesion. The individual parameter predictability was less; paraspinal EMG had the highest individual predictability (67%).

Conclusions

EMG of the paraspinal muscles helps differentiate between root avulsion and distal rupture. It is useful in the planning for surgery, especially when the lesions are evaluated in combination with clinical examination and routine EMG.

Keywords:  Brachial plexus, injury, paraspinal electromyography

 
  • 1 No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

PII: S0363-5023(03)00423-4

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.08.004

Journal of Hand Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 140-143, January 2004